From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:29:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKT2mW0xVZltBOSh@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210518191303.4135296-1-hpa@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@zytor.com>
>
> This patchset addresses several inconsistencies in the handling of
> system call numbers in x86-64 (and x32).
> arch/x86/entry/common.c | 93 +++--
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 488 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
Thanks Peter - this series is really nice now, and I agree that this
inconsistency should be fixed.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-18 19:12 [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-18 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86/syscall: update and extend selftest syscall_numbering_64 H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23 ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Update and extend syscall_numbering_64 tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86/syscall: simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering.c H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23 ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Simplify message reporting in syscall_numbering tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86/syscall: add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering.c H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23 ` [tip: x86/entry] selftests/x86/syscall: Add tests under ptrace to syscall_numbering_64 tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/syscall: sign-extend system calls on entry to int H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23 ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry/64: Sign-extend " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86/syscall: treat out of range and gap system calls the same H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 13:23 ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Treat " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-18 19:13 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/syscall: use int everywhere for system call numbers H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-20 8:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-21 21:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-05-22 13:19 ` David Laight
2021-05-25 8:13 ` [tip: x86/entry] x86/entry: Use " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2021-05-19 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2021-05-19 16:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKT2mW0xVZltBOSh@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.