Re: [PATCH 07/12] docs: accounting: update delay-accounting.rst reference

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Lepton Wu <ytht.net@gmail.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>, Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] docs: accounting: update delay-accounting.rst reference
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:20:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLiC1bFKAf9RtwuB@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210602221940.7e0a6135@coco.lan>

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:19:40PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:29:23 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> escreveu:

> > Afaict both vim (gf) and emacs (M-x ffap) can do this. That covers about
> > 99% of all sane editors no? :-)
> 
> Heh, not quite ;-) Here, I use nano(/pico), from the old times where 
> (al)pine was my emailer. I can live with vim, but I prefer an editor
> that starts in editing mode.

echo "startinsert" >> ~/.vimrc

> I tried to use emacs a few times, but my fingers are too much into
> pico/nano control keys, so it was ending by making me typing a lot
> slower. Besides that, nano works well on 99% of my daily needs. 
> 
> When I need more fancy, like regex substitutions, changing/moving
> big code blocks, editing multiple files at the same time, etc, 

nano can in fact do the multi-file thing, see nano -F, or add "set
multibuffer" to nanorc.

> then I just use a GUI editor (currently kate, but seeking for
> a good replacement, as some changes during F33 times - still 
> present on F34 - caused some regressions).

The fact that you need a second editor; and are looking for a
replacement disqualifies nano (and Kate for that matter) as a sane
editor IMO.

You can ofcourse start extending nano :-)