All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
Cc: jlayton@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ceph: new device mount syntax
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:32:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNsEs9IwTEEqOTHj@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210628075545.702106-2-vshankar@redhat.com>

[ As I said, I didn't fully reviewed this patch.  Just sending out a few
  comments. ]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 01:25:42PM +0530, Venky Shankar wrote:
> Old mount device syntax (source) has the following problems:
> 
> - mounts to the same cluster but with different fsnames
>   and/or creds have identical device string which can
>   confuse xfstests.
> 
> - Userspace mount helper tool resolves monitor addresses
>   and fill in mon addrs automatically, but that means the
>   device shown in /proc/mounts is different than what was
>   used for mounting.
> 
> New device syntax is as follows:
> 
>   cephuser@fsid.mycephfs2=/path
> 
> Note, there is no "monitor address" in the device string.
> That gets passed in as mount option. This keeps the device
> string same when monitor addresses change (on remounts).
> 
> Also note that the userspace mount helper tool is backward
> compatible. I.e., the mount helper will fallback to using
> old syntax after trying to mount with the new syntax.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/super.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  fs/ceph/super.h |   3 ++
>  2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.c b/fs/ceph/super.c
> index 9b1b7f4cfdd4..950a28ad9c59 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ enum {
>  	Opt_mds_namespace,
>  	Opt_recover_session,
>  	Opt_source,
> +	Opt_mon_addr,
>  	/* string args above */
>  	Opt_dirstat,
>  	Opt_rbytes,
> @@ -196,6 +197,7 @@ static const struct fs_parameter_spec ceph_mount_parameters[] = {
>  	fsparam_u32	("rsize",			Opt_rsize),
>  	fsparam_string	("snapdirname",			Opt_snapdirname),
>  	fsparam_string	("source",			Opt_source),
> +	fsparam_string	("mon_addr",			Opt_mon_addr),
>  	fsparam_u32	("wsize",			Opt_wsize),
>  	fsparam_flag_no	("wsync",			Opt_wsync),
>  	{}
> @@ -226,10 +228,68 @@ static void canonicalize_path(char *path)
>  	path[j] = '\0';
>  }
>  
> +static int ceph_parse_old_source(const char *dev_name, const char *dev_name_end,
> +				 struct fs_context *fc)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	struct ceph_parse_opts_ctx *pctx = fc->fs_private;
> +	struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt = pctx->opts;
> +
> +	if (*dev_name_end != ':')
> +		return invalfc(fc, "separator ':' missing in source");
> +
> +	r = ceph_parse_mon_ips(dev_name, dev_name_end - dev_name,
> +			       pctx->copts, fc->log.log);
> +	if (r)
> +		return r;
> +
> +	fsopt->new_dev_syntax = false;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ceph_parse_new_source(const char *dev_name, const char *dev_name_end,
> +				 struct fs_context *fc)
> +{
> +	struct ceph_parse_opts_ctx *pctx = fc->fs_private;
> +	struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt = pctx->opts;
> +	char *fsid_start, *fs_name_start;
> +
> +	if (*dev_name_end != '=')
> +                return invalfc(fc, "separator '=' missing in source");

An annoying thing is that we'll always see this error message when falling
back to the old_source method.

(Also, is there a good reason for using '=' instead of ':'?  I probably
missed this discussion somewhere else already...)

> +
> +	fsid_start = strchr(dev_name, '@');
> +	if (!fsid_start)
> +		return invalfc(fc, "missing cluster fsid");
> +	++fsid_start; /* start of cluster fsid */
> +
> +	fs_name_start = strchr(fsid_start, '.');
> +	if (!fs_name_start)
> +		return invalfc(fc, "missing file system name");
> +
> +	++fs_name_start; /* start of file system name */
> +	fsopt->mds_namespace = kstrndup(fs_name_start,
> +					dev_name_end - fs_name_start, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!fsopt->mds_namespace)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	dout("file system (mds namespace) '%s'\n", fsopt->mds_namespace);
> +
> +	fsopt->new_dev_syntax = true;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
> - * Parse the source parameter.  Distinguish the server list from the path.
> + * Parse the source parameter for new device format. Distinguish the device
> + * spec from the path. Try parsing new device format and fallback to old
> + * format if needed.
>   *
> - * The source will look like:
> + * New device syntax will looks like:
> + *     <device_spec>=/<path>
> + * where
> + *     <device_spec> is name@fsid.fsname
> + *     <path> is optional, but if present must begin with '/'
> + * (monitor addresses are passed via mount option)
> + *
> + * Old device syntax is:
>   *     <server_spec>[,<server_spec>...]:[<path>]
>   * where
>   *     <server_spec> is <ip>[:<port>]
> @@ -262,22 +322,48 @@ static int ceph_parse_source(struct fs_parameter *param, struct fs_context *fc)
>  		dev_name_end = dev_name + strlen(dev_name);
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_name_end--;		/* back up to ':' separator */
> -	if (dev_name_end < dev_name || *dev_name_end != ':')
> -		return invalfc(fc, "No path or : separator in source");
> +	dev_name_end--;		/* back up to separator */
> +	if (dev_name_end < dev_name)
> +		return invalfc(fc, "path missing in source");
>  
>  	dout("device name '%.*s'\n", (int)(dev_name_end - dev_name), dev_name);
>  	if (fsopt->server_path)
>  		dout("server path '%s'\n", fsopt->server_path);
>  
> -	ret = ceph_parse_mon_ips(param->string, dev_name_end - dev_name,
> -				 pctx->copts, fc->log.log);
> +	dout("trying new device syntax");
> +	ret = ceph_parse_new_source(dev_name, dev_name_end, fc);
> +	if (ret == 0)
> +		goto done;
> +
> +	dout("trying old device syntax");
> +	ret = ceph_parse_old_source(dev_name, dev_name_end, fc);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out;
>  
> + done:
>  	fc->source = param->string;
>  	param->string = NULL;
> -	return 0;
> + out:
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ceph_parse_mon_addr(struct fs_parameter *param,
> +			       struct fs_context *fc)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	struct ceph_parse_opts_ctx *pctx = fc->fs_private;
> +	struct ceph_mount_options *fsopt = pctx->opts;
> +
> +	kfree(fsopt->mon_addr);
> +	fsopt->mon_addr = kstrdup(param->string, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!fsopt->mon_addr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	strreplace(param->string, '/', ',');
> +	r = ceph_parse_mon_ips(param->string, strlen(param->string),
> +			       pctx->copts, fc->log.log);
> +	param->string = NULL;

I think this will result in a memory leak.  Why don't we simply set
fsopt->mon_addr to param->string instead of kstrdup'ing it?

Cheers,
--
Luís

> +	return r;
>  }
>  
>  static int ceph_parse_mount_param(struct fs_context *fc,
> @@ -322,6 +408,8 @@ static int ceph_parse_mount_param(struct fs_context *fc,
>  		if (fc->source)
>  			return invalfc(fc, "Multiple sources specified");
>  		return ceph_parse_source(param, fc);
> +	case Opt_mon_addr:
> +		return ceph_parse_mon_addr(param, fc);
>  	case Opt_wsize:
>  		if (result.uint_32 < PAGE_SIZE ||
>  		    result.uint_32 > CEPH_MAX_WRITE_SIZE)
> @@ -473,6 +561,7 @@ static void destroy_mount_options(struct ceph_mount_options *args)
>  	kfree(args->mds_namespace);
>  	kfree(args->server_path);
>  	kfree(args->fscache_uniq);
> +	kfree(args->mon_addr);
>  	kfree(args);
>  }
>  
> @@ -516,6 +605,10 @@ static int compare_mount_options(struct ceph_mount_options *new_fsopt,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	ret = strcmp_null(fsopt1->mon_addr, fsopt2->mon_addr);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return ceph_compare_options(new_opt, fsc->client);
>  }
>  
> @@ -571,9 +664,13 @@ static int ceph_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
>  	if ((fsopt->flags & CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_NOCOPYFROM) == 0)
>  		seq_puts(m, ",copyfrom");
>  
> -	if (fsopt->mds_namespace)
> +	/* dump mds_namespace when old device syntax is in use */
> +	if (fsopt->mds_namespace && !fsopt->new_dev_syntax)
>  		seq_show_option(m, "mds_namespace", fsopt->mds_namespace);
>  
> +	if (fsopt->mon_addr)
> +		seq_printf(m, ",mon_addr=%s", fsopt->mon_addr);
> +
>  	if (fsopt->flags & CEPH_MOUNT_OPT_CLEANRECOVER)
>  		seq_show_option(m, "recover_session", "clean");
>  
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h
> index 839e6b0239ee..557348ff3203 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h
> @@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ struct ceph_mount_options {
>  	unsigned int max_readdir;       /* max readdir result (entries) */
>  	unsigned int max_readdir_bytes; /* max readdir result (bytes) */
>  
> +	bool new_dev_syntax;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * everything above this point can be memcmp'd; everything below
>  	 * is handled in compare_mount_options()
> @@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ struct ceph_mount_options {
>  	char *mds_namespace;  /* default NULL */
>  	char *server_path;    /* default NULL (means "/") */
>  	char *fscache_uniq;   /* default NULL */
> +	char *mon_addr;
>  };
>  
>  struct ceph_fs_client {
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-29 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28  7:55 [PATCH 0/4] ceph: new mount device syntax Venky Shankar
2021-06-28  7:55 ` [PATCH 1/4] ceph: new device mount syntax Venky Shankar
2021-06-29 11:32   ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2021-06-29 13:54     ` Venky Shankar
2021-06-29 15:10       ` Jeff Layton
2021-06-29 15:42         ` Luis Henriques
2021-06-28  7:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] ceph: validate cluster FSID for new device syntax Venky Shankar
2021-06-28 15:04   ` Jeff Layton
2021-06-29  4:42     ` Venky Shankar
2021-06-28  7:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] ceph: record updated mon_addr on remount Venky Shankar
2021-06-28 15:19   ` Jeff Layton
2021-06-28  7:55 ` [PATCH 4/4] doc: document new CephFS mount device syntax Venky Shankar
2021-06-28 15:26   ` Jeff Layton
2021-06-29  6:18     ` Venky Shankar
2021-06-28 15:32 ` [PATCH 0/4] ceph: new " Jeff Layton
2021-06-29 11:22 ` Luis Henriques
2021-06-29 12:13   ` Venky Shankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YNsEs9IwTEEqOTHj@suse.de \
    --to=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.