From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/i915: Add a table with a descriptor for all i915 modifiers
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 00:34:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWdQy9CfagVO3nK8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013210141.GA19061@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:01:41AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 11:14:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 03:19:08AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > + /* Wa_22011186057 */
> > > + if (IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 11)
> > > + return true;
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915))
> > > + return pipe != PIPE_C;
> > > +
> > > + return pipe != PIPE_C &&
> > > + (plane_id == PLANE_PRIMARY ||
> > > + plane_id == PLANE_SPRITE0);
> > > +}
> >
> > A bit tempted to say we should chop this up into more
> > platform specific variants. But that can be left for later I guess.
>
> You mean clarifying that last check is for SKL/BXT? Would a code comment
> be ok?
I don't really enjoy comments when the code can express what we
mean more clearly. So I'm thinking just a clean skl/glk/icl split
could perhaps be the thing. Pretty sure we have that exact if
ladder in the init function already at least once so could
shove this stuff in there as well.
But it's not really important for the moment.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-13 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 20:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Simplify handling of modifiers Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Add a table with a descriptor for all i915 modifiers Imre Deak
2021-10-07 21:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-07 21:26 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-07 21:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-07 22:00 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-08 9:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-13 20:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-13 21:01 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-13 21:34 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-10-13 20:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-14 10:07 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-14 14:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Jani Nikula
2021-10-14 14:16 ` Jani Nikula
2021-10-14 15:03 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-14 15:48 ` Jani Nikula
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Move intel_get_format_info() to intel_fb.c Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-13 20:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-13 21:06 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Add tiling attribute to the modifier descriptor Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-13 20:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-13 21:08 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Simplify the modifier check for interlaced scanout support Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Unexport is_semiplanar_uv_plane() Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Move intel_format_info_is_yuv_semiplanar() to intel_fb.c Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Add a platform independent way to get the RC CCS CC plane Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Handle CCS CC planes separately from CCS control planes Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Add a platform independent way to check for " Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-13 20:27 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-13 20:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-13 21:32 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-13 21:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-13 22:28 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-13 22:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-10-14 10:10 ` Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Move is_ccs_modifier() to intel_fb.c Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-07 20:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Add functions to check for RC CCS CC and MC CCS modifiers Imre Deak
2021-10-08 0:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2021-10-07 21:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Simplify handling of modifiers Patchwork
2021-10-07 21:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-07 21:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-08 0:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Simplify handling of modifiers (rev9) Patchwork
2021-10-08 0:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-08 1:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-10-08 2:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-13 19:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Simplify handling of modifiers Juha-Pekka Heikkila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YWdQy9CfagVO3nK8@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.