All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>,
	Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Thierry Delisle <tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:18:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YboxjUM+D9Kg52mO@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTs51Xb6m=htpWsVk577n-h_pRCpqRcBg6-OhBav8OadikHkw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:56:06AM -0800, Peter Oskolkov wrote:

> > Right, so the problem I'm having is that a single idle server ptr like
> > before can trivially miss waking annother idle server.
> 
> I believe the approach I used in my patchset, suggested by Thierry
> Delisle, works.
> 
> In short, there is a single idle server ptr for the kernel to work
> with. The userspace maintains a list of idle servers. If the ptr is
> NULL, the list is empty. When the kernel wakes the idle server it
> sees, the server reaps the runnable worker list and wakes another idle
> server from the userspace list, if available. This newly woken idle
> server repoints the ptr to itself, checks the runnable worker list, to
> avoid missing a woken worker, then goes to sleep.
> 
> Why do you think this approach is not OK?

Suppose at least 4 servers, 2 idle, 2 working.

Now, the first of the working servers (lets call it S0) gets a wakeup
(say Ta), it finds the idle server (say S3) and consumes it, sticking Ta
on S3 and kicking it alive.

Concurrently and loosing the race the other working server (S1) gets a
wake-up from Tb, like said, it lost, no idle server, so Tb goes on the
queue of S1.

So then S3 wakes, finds Ta and they live happily ever after.

While S2 and Tb fail to meet one another and both linger in sadness.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-15 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 20:44 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched/umcg: add WF_CURRENT_CPU and externise ttwu Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86/uaccess: Implement unsafe_try_cmpxchg_user() Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-20 17:30   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-21 11:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 20:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-21 17:19   ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-14 14:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-14 15:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-14 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 11:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 12:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 12:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-18 10:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-18 18:19         ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-19  8:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19 17:33             ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-19  8:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19  8:59           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-19 17:52             ` Peter Oskolkov
2022-01-20 10:37               ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-01-17 13:04     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-24 11:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-14 21:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15  3:46 ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 10:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 13:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 17:56     ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 18:18       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-12-15 19:49         ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 22:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 23:26             ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-16 13:23               ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-15 18:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 21:04         ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 23:16           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 23:31             ` Peter Oskolkov
2021-12-15 10:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-15 13:49     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-15 17:54       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YboxjUM+D9Kg52mO@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=avagin@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=posk@google.com \
    --cc=posk@posk.io \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.