All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: test autodefrag with regular and hole extents
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:57:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfPaJHzW4/KJoRAI@debian9.Home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220128002701.11971-2-wqu@suse.com>

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 08:27:00AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> In v5.11~v5.15 kernels, there is a regression in autodefrag that if a
> cluster (up to 256K in size) has even a single hole, the whole cluster
> will be rejected.
> 
> This will greatly reduce the efficiency of autodefrag.
> 
> The behavior is fixed in v5.16 by a full rework, although the rework
> itself has other problems, it at least solves the problem.
> 
> Here we add a test case to reproduce the case, where we have a 128K
> cluster, the first half is fragmented extents which can be defragged.
> The second half is hole.
> 
> Make sure autodefrag can defrag the 64K part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Tried the test, and it succeeds here without the kernel fix applied.
I've ran it 10 times, and it always passed without the kernel fix.

Thanks.

> ---
> Changelog:
> v2:
> - Use the previously define _get_file_extent_sector() helper
>   This also removed some out-of-sync error messages
> 
> - Trigger autodefrag using commit=1 mount option
>   No need for special purpose patch any more.
> 
> - Use xfs_io -s to skip several sync calls
> 
> - Shorten the subject of the commit
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/256     | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/256.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/256
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/256.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/256 b/tests/btrfs/256
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..def83a15
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/256
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (C) 2022 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 256
> +#
> +# Make sure btrfs auto defrag can properly defrag clusters which has hole
> +# in the middle
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto defrag quick
> +
> +. ./common/btrfs
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +# Needs 4K sectorsize, as larger sectorsize can change the file layout.
> +_require_btrfs_support_sectorsize 4096
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# Need datacow to show which range is defragged, and we're testing
> +# autodefrag
> +_scratch_mount -o datacow,autodefrag
> +
> +# Create a layout where we have fragmented extents at [0, 64k) (sync write in
> +# reserve order), then a hole at [64k, 128k)
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -s -c "pwrite 48k 16k" -c "pwrite 32k 16k" \
> +		-c "pwrite 16k 16k" -c "pwrite 0 16k" \
> +		$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar >> $seqres.full
> +truncate -s 128k $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
> +
> +old_csum=$(_md5_checksum $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar)
> +echo "=== File extent layout before autodefrag ===" >> $seqres.full
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" "$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar" >> $seqres.full
> +echo "old md5=$old_csum" >> $seqres.full
> +
> +old_regular=$(_get_file_extent_sector "$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar" 0)
> +old_hole=$(_get_file_extent_sector "$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar" 64k)
> +
> +# Now trigger autodefrag, autodefrag is triggered in the cleaner thread,
> +# which will be woken up by commit thread
> +_scratch_remount commit=1
> +sleep 3
> +sync
> +
> +new_csum=$(_md5_checksum $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar)
> +new_regular=$(_get_file_extent_sector "$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar" 0)
> +new_hole=$(_get_file_extent_sector "$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar" 64k)
> +
> +echo "=== File extent layout after autodefrag ===" >> $seqres.full
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" "$SCRATCH_MNT/foobar" >> $seqres.full
> +echo "new md5=$new_csum" >> $seqres.full
> +
> +# In v5.11~v5.15 kernels, regular extents won't get defragged, and would trigger
> +# the following output
> +if [ $new_regular == $old_regular ]; then
> +	echo "regular extents didn't get defragged"
> +fi
> +
> +# In v5.10 and earlier kernel, autodefrag may choose to defrag holes,
> +# which should be avoided.
> +if [ "$new_hole" != "$old_hole" ]; then
> +	echo "hole extents got defragged"
> +fi
> +
> +# Defrag should not change file content
> +if [ "$new_csum" != "$old_csum" ]; then
> +	echo "file content changed"
> +fi
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/256.out b/tests/btrfs/256.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..7ee8e2e5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/256.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 256
> +Silence is golden
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-28  0:26 [PATCH v3 1/3] btrfs: test defrag with regular and preallocated extents Qu Wenruo
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: test autodefrag with regular and hole extents Qu Wenruo
2022-01-28 11:57   ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-01-28 12:13     ` Qu Wenruo
2022-01-28 12:32       ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-28  0:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: test defrag with compressed extents Qu Wenruo
2022-01-28 12:20   ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-28 11:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] btrfs: test defrag with regular and preallocated extents Filipe Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YfPaJHzW4/KJoRAI@debian9.Home \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.