All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Jon Grimm <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>,
	David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@amd.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Liam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Don't forget about L1-injected events
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 22:07:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ykd3ldZYDTndgxHI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8529068e-7d2b-dc54-e259-182ba733105f@maciej.szmigiero.name>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2830 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 1.04.2022 02:08, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > where as SVM unconditionally treats #BP and #OF as soft:
> > 
> >    Injecting an exception (TYPE = 3) with vectors 3 or 4 behaves like a trap raised by
> >    INT3 and INTO instructions
> > 
> > Now I'm curious why Intel doesn't do the same...
> 
> Perhaps it's just a result of VMX and SVM being developed independently,
> in parallel.

That definitely factors in, but nothing in VMX is spurious/random, there's always
a reason/motivation behind the architecture, even if that reason isn't obvious.
It bugs me that I can't figure out the "why" :-)

Ugh, but SVM still needs to fix injection for software interrupts, i.e. svm_inject_irq()
is broken.

> > > We still need L1 -> L2 event injection detection to restore the NextRIP
> > > field when re-injecting an event that uses it.
> > 
> > You lost me on this one.  KVM L0 is only (and always!) responsible for saving the
> > relevant info into vmcb12, why does it need to detect where the vectoring exception
> > came from?
> 
> Look at the description of patch 4 of this patch set - after some
> L2 VMEXITs handled by L0 (in other words, which do *not* result in
> a nested VMEXIT to L1) the VMCB02 NextRIP field will be zero
> (APM 15.7.1 "State Saved on Exit" describes when this happens).
> 
> If we attempt to re-inject some types of events with the NextRIP field
> being zero the return address pushed on stack will also be zero, which
> will obviously do bad things to the L2 when it returns from
> an (exception|interrupt) handler.

Right, but that issue isn't unique to L2 exits handled by L0.  E.g. if KVM is using
shadow paging and a #PF "owned" by KVM occurs while vectoring INT3/INTO, then KVM
needs to restore NextRIP after resolving the #PF.

Argh, but NextRIP being zeroed makes it painful to handle the scenario where the
INT3/INT0 isn't injected, because doesn't have a record of the instruction length.
That's a big fail on SVM's part :-/

Huh, actually, it's not too bad to support.  SVM already has the code to compute
the next RIP via the emulator, it's easy enough to reuse that code to calculate
NextRIP and then unwind RIP.

With your patch 1, your selftest and all KVM unit tests passes[*] with the attached
patch.  I'll split it up and send out a proper series with your other fixes and
selftests.  I apologize for usurping your series, I was sketching up a diff to
show what I had in mind for reinjecting and it ended up being less code than I
expected to actually get it working.

[*] The new SVM KUT tests don't pass, but that's a different mess, and anything
    that uses INVCPID doesn't pass with nrips=0 && npt=0 because KVM's emulator
    doesn't know how to decode INVPCID, but KVM needs to intercept INVPCID when
    using shadow paging.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-KVM-SVM-Re-inject-soft-interrupts-instead-of-retryin.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 6506 bytes --]

From 45c0408ca6738a98a3284837d9383be966e86901 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:01:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Re-inject soft interrupts instead of retrying
 instruction

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |   4 +-
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 2c86bd9176c6..c534d00ae194 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -370,6 +370,45 @@ static int svm_skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static int svm_update_soft_interrupt_rip(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long rip, old_rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
+	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * Due to architectural shortcomings, the CPU doesn't always provide
+	 * NextRIP, e.g. if KVM intercepted an exception that occurred while
+	 * the CPU was vectoring an INTO/INT3 in the guest.  Temporarily skip
+	 * the instruction even if NextRIP is supported to acquire the next
+	 * RIP so that it can be shoved into the NextRIP field, otherwise
+	 * hardware will fail to advance guest RIP during event injection.
+	 * Drop the exception/interrupt if emulation fails and effectively
+	 * retry the instruction, it's the least awful option.
+	 */
+	if (!svm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * If NextRIP is supported, rewind RIP and update NextRip.  If NextRip
+	 * isn't supported, keep the result of the skip as the CPU obviously
+	 * won't advance RIP, but stash away the injection information so that
+	 * RIP can be unwound if injection fails.
+	 */
+	if (nrips) {
+		kvm_rip_write(vcpu, old_rip);
+		svm->vmcb->control.next_rip = rip;
+	} else {
+		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
+			svm->vmcb->control.next_rip = rip;
+
+		svm->soft_int_linear_rip = rip + svm->vmcb->save.cs.base;
+		svm->soft_int_injected = rip - old_rip;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
@@ -379,21 +418,9 @@ static void svm_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	kvm_deliver_exception_payload(vcpu);
 
-	if (nr == BP_VECTOR && !nrips) {
-		unsigned long rip, old_rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
-
-		/*
-		 * For guest debugging where we have to reinject #BP if some
-		 * INT3 is guest-owned:
-		 * Emulate nRIP by moving RIP forward. Will fail if injection
-		 * raises a fault that is not intercepted. Still better than
-		 * failing in all cases.
-		 */
-		(void)svm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
-		rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
-		svm->int3_rip = rip + svm->vmcb->save.cs.base;
-		svm->int3_injected = rip - old_rip;
-	}
+	if (kvm_exception_is_soft(nr) &&
+	    svm_update_soft_interrupt_rip(vcpu))
+		return;
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr
 		| SVM_EVTINJ_VALID
@@ -3382,14 +3409,24 @@ static void svm_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 static void svm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
+	u32 type;
 
 	WARN_ON(!gif_set(svm));
 
+	if (vcpu->arch.interrupt.soft) {
+		if (svm_update_soft_interrupt_rip(vcpu))
+			return;
+
+		type = SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_SOFT;
+	} else {
+		type = SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR;
+	}
+
 	trace_kvm_inj_virq(vcpu->arch.interrupt.nr);
 	++vcpu->stat.irq_injections;
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = vcpu->arch.interrupt.nr |
-		SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR;
+				       SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | type;
 }
 
 void svm_complete_interrupt_delivery(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int delivery_mode,
@@ -3672,9 +3709,9 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	u8 vector;
 	int type;
 	u32 exitintinfo = svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info;
-	unsigned int3_injected = svm->int3_injected;
+	unsigned soft_int_injected = svm->soft_int_injected;
 
-	svm->int3_injected = 0;
+	svm->soft_int_injected = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we've made progress since setting HF_IRET_MASK, we've
@@ -3694,6 +3731,18 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (!(exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID))
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * If NextRIP isn't enabled, KVM must manually advance RIP prior to
+	 * injecting the soft exception/interrupt.  That advancement needs to
+	 * be unwound if vectoring didn't complete.  Note, the _new_ event may
+	 * not be the injected event, e.g. if KVM injected an INTn, the INTn
+	 * hit a #NP in the guest, and the #NP encountered a #PF, the #NP will
+	 * be the reported vectored event, but RIP still needs to be unwound.
+	 */
+	if (soft_int_injected &&
+	    kvm_is_linear_rip(vcpu, to_svm(vcpu)->soft_int_linear_rip))
+		kvm_rip_write(vcpu, kvm_rip_read(vcpu) - soft_int_injected);
+
 	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
 
 	vector = exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VEC_MASK;
@@ -3710,18 +3759,6 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (vector == X86_TRAP_VC)
 			break;
 
-		/*
-		 * In case of software exceptions, do not reinject the vector,
-		 * but re-execute the instruction instead. Rewind RIP first
-		 * if we emulated INT3 before.
-		 */
-		if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vector)) {
-			if (vector == BP_VECTOR && int3_injected &&
-			    kvm_is_linear_rip(vcpu, svm->int3_rip))
-				kvm_rip_write(vcpu,
-					      kvm_rip_read(vcpu) - int3_injected);
-			break;
-		}
 		if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) {
 			u32 err = svm->vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err;
 			kvm_requeue_exception_e(vcpu, vector, err);
@@ -3732,9 +3769,13 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_INTR:
 		kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, vector, false);
 		break;
+	case SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_SOFT:
+		kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, vector, true);
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
+
 }
 
 static void svm_cancel_injection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 47e7427d0395..a770a1c7ddd2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
 	bool nmi_singlestep;
 	u64 nmi_singlestep_guest_rflags;
 
-	unsigned int3_injected;
-	unsigned long int3_rip;
+	unsigned soft_int_injected;
+	unsigned long soft_int_linear_rip;
 
 	/* optional nested SVM features that are enabled for this guest  */
 	bool nrips_enabled                : 1;

base-commit: 26f97f8db06dc08a2b6a48692cdc1d89b288905d
-- 
2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-01 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-10 21:38 [PATCH 0/5] nSVM: L1 -> L2 event injection fixes and a self-test Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: nSVM: Sync next_rip field from vmcb12 to vmcb02 Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-01 18:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-01 19:08     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-01 21:51       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04  9:50         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: SVM: Downgrade BUG_ON() to WARN_ON() in svm_inject_irq() Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-04  9:50   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Don't forget about L1-injected events Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-30 21:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-30 22:16     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-30 23:20       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-31 23:09         ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-01  0:08           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-01 16:05             ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-01 22:07               ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-04  9:53   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-04 21:05     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: nSVM: Restore next_rip when doing L1 -> L2 event re-injection Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: selftests: nSVM: Add svm_nested_soft_inject_test Maciej S. Szmigiero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ykd3ldZYDTndgxHI@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=David.Kaplan@amd.com \
    --cc=Jon.Grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.