All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>
To: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Bug when mapping designware PCIe MSI msg
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 19:06:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yo0soniFborDl7+C@google.com> (raw)

Hi All,

I've been debugging a PCIe dma mapping issue and I believe I have tracked the
bug down to how the designware PCIe host driver is mapping the MSI msg. In
commit 07940c369a6b ("PCI: dwc: Fix MSI page leakage in suspend/resume") [1],
the PCIe driver was re-worked to drop allocating a page for the MSI msg in
favor of using an address from the driver data. Then in commit 660c486590aa
("PCI: dwc: Set 32-bit DMA mask for MSI target address allocation") [2],
a 32-bit DMA mask was enforced for this MSI msg address in order to support
both 32-bit and 64-bit MSI address capable hardware. Both of these changes
together expose a bug on hardware that supports an MSI address greather than
32-bits. For example, the Pixel 6 supports a 36-bit MSI address and therefore
calls:

  dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));

Before [2], this was fine because getting an address for the driver data that
was less than or equal to 36-bits was common enough to not hit this issue, but
after [2] I started hitting the below DMA buffer overflow when the driver data
address was greater than 32-bits:

  exynos-pcie-rc 14520000.pcie: DMA addr 0x000000088536d908+2 overflow (mask ffffffff, bus limit 0).
          : WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 8 at kernel/dma/direct.h:99 dma_map_page_attrs+0x254/0x278
  ...
  Hardware name: Oriole DVT (DT)
  Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
  pstate  : 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
  pc      : dma_map_page_attrs+0x254/0x278
  lr      : dma_map_page_attrs+0x250/0x278
  sp      : ffffffc0080938b0
  ...
  Call trace:
          : dma_map_page_attrs+0x254/0x278
          : dma_map_single_attrs+0xdc/0x10c
          : dw_pcie_host_init+0x4a0/0x78c
          : exynos_pcie_rc_add_port+0x7c/0x104 [pcie_exynos_gs]
          : exynos_pcie_rc_probe+0x4c8/0x6ec [pcie_exynos_gs]
          : platform_probe+0x80/0x200
          : really_probe+0x1cc/0x458
          : __driver_probe_device+0x204/0x260
          : driver_probe_device+0x44/0x4b0
          : __device_attach_driver+0x200/0x308
          : __device_attach+0x20c/0x330


The underlying issue is that using the driver data (which can be a 64-bit
address) for the MSI msg mapping causes a DMA_MAPPING_ERROR when the dma mask
is less than 64-bits. I'm not familiar enough with the dma mapping code to
suggest a full-proof solution to solve this; however, I don't think reverting
[1] is a great solution since it addresses a valid issue and reverting [2]
doesn't actually solve the bug since the driver data address isn't restricted
by the dma mask.

I hope that helps explain the issue. Please let me know your thoughts on how we
should address this.

Thanks,
Will


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201009155505.5a580ef5@xhacker.debian/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117165312.25847-1-vidyas@nvidia.com

             reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24 19:06 William McVicker [this message]
2022-05-24 20:41 ` Bug when mapping designware PCIe MSI msg Rob Herring
2022-05-25 22:38   ` William McVicker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yo0soniFborDl7+C@google.com \
    --to=willmcvicker@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.