All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: shrinkers: introduce debugfs interface for memory shrinkers
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:36:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YooSSCnphhuwfOOc@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509183820.573666-3-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 11:38:16AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This commit introduces the /sys/kernel/debug/shrinker debugfs
> interface which provides an ability to observe the state of
> individual kernel memory shrinkers.
> 
> Because the feature adds some memory overhead (which shouldn't be
> large unless there is a huge amount of registered shrinkers), it's
> guarded by a config option (enabled by default).
> 
> This commit introduces the "count" interface for each shrinker
> registered in the system.
> 
> The output is in the following format:

Hi Roman,

Shoud we print a title to show what those numbers mean?  In this case,
it is more understandable.

> <cgroup inode id> <nr of objects on node 0> <nr of objects on node 1>...
> <cgroup inode id> <nr of objects on node 0> <nr of objects on node 1>...
> ...
> 
> To reduce the size of output on machines with many thousands cgroups,
> if the total number of objects on all nodes is 0, the line is omitted.
> 
> If the shrinker is not memcg-aware or CONFIG_MEMCG is off, 0 is
> printed as cgroup inode id. If the shrinker is not numa-aware, 0's are
> printed for all nodes except the first one.
> 
> This commit gives debugfs entries simple numeric names, which are not
> very convenient. The following commit in the series will provide
> shrinkers with more meaningful names.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/shrinker.h |  19 ++++-
>  lib/Kconfig.debug        |   9 +++
>  mm/Makefile              |   1 +
>  mm/shrinker_debug.c      | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/vmscan.c              |   6 +-
>  5 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 mm/shrinker_debug.c
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> index 76fbf92b04d9..2ced8149c513 100644
> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ struct shrinker {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>  	/* ID in shrinker_idr */
>  	int id;
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
> +	int debugfs_id;
> +	struct dentry *debugfs_entry;
>  #endif
>  	/* objs pending delete, per node */
>  	atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
> @@ -94,4 +98,17 @@ extern int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
>  extern void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
>  extern void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
>  extern void synchronize_shrinkers(void);
> -#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
> +extern int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> +extern void shrinker_debugfs_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker);
> +#else /* CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG */
> +static inline int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static inline void shrinker_debugfs_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG */
> +#endif /* _LINUX_SHRINKER_H */
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 3fd7a2e9eaf1..5fa65a649798 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -733,6 +733,15 @@ config SLUB_STATS
>  	  out which slabs are relevant to a particular load.
>  	  Try running: slabinfo -DA
>  
> +config SHRINKER_DEBUG
> +	default y
> +	bool "Enable shrinker debugging support"
> +	depends on DEBUG_FS
> +	help
> +	  Say Y to enable the shrinker debugfs interface which provides
> +	  visibility into the kernel memory shrinkers subsystem.
> +	  Disable it to avoid an extra memory footprint.
> +
>  config HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>  	bool
>  
> diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile
> index 298c9991ab75..8083fa85a348 100644
> --- a/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/mm/Makefile
> @@ -133,3 +133,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PAGE_REPORTING) += page_reporting.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_IO_MAPPING) += io-mapping.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE) += bootmem_info.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_IOREMAP) += ioremap.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG) += shrinker_debug.o
> diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fd1f805a581a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> +#include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/shrinker.h>
> +#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> +
> +/* defined in vmscan.c */
> +extern struct rw_semaphore shrinker_rwsem;
> +extern struct list_head shrinker_list;
> +
> +static DEFINE_IDA(shrinker_debugfs_ida);
> +static struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_root;
> +
> +static unsigned long shrinker_count_objects(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> +					    struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +					    unsigned long *count_per_node)
> +{
> +	unsigned long nr, total = 0;
> +	int nid;
> +
> +	for_each_node(nid) {
> +		if (nid == 0 || (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)) {
> +			struct shrink_control sc = {
> +				.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> +				.nid = nid,
> +				.memcg = memcg,
> +			};
> +
> +			nr = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, &sc);
> +			if (nr == SHRINK_EMPTY)
> +				nr = 0;
> +		} else {
> +			nr = 0;

For efficiency, we could break here, right?

> +		}
> +
> +		count_per_node[nid] = nr;
> +		total += nr;
> +	}
> +
> +	return total;
> +}
> +
> +static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> +{
> +	struct shrinker *shrinker = (struct shrinker *)m->private;

Maybe we cound drop the cast since m->private is a void * type.

> +	unsigned long *count_per_node = NULL;

Do not need to be initialized, right?

> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> +	unsigned long total;
> +	bool memcg_aware;
> +	int ret, nid;
> +
> +	count_per_node = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!count_per_node)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(count_per_node);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	memcg_aware = shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
> +
> +	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +	do {
> +		if (memcg && !mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		total = shrinker_count_objects(shrinker,
> +					       memcg_aware ? memcg : NULL,
> +					       count_per_node);
> +		if (total) {
> +			seq_printf(m, "%lu", mem_cgroup_ino(memcg));
> +			for_each_node(nid)
> +				seq_printf(m, " %lu", count_per_node[nid]);
> +			seq_puts(m, "\n");

seq_putc(m, '\n') is more efficient.

> +		}
> +
> +		if (!memcg_aware) {
> +			mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> +			mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
> +			ret = -EINTR;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		cond_resched();

We are in rcu read lock, cannot be scheduled, right?

> +	} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
> +
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +
> +	kfree(count_per_node);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(shrinker_debugfs_count);
> +
> +int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> +{
> +	struct dentry *entry;
> +	char buf[16];
> +	int id;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +
> +	/* debugfs isn't initialized yet, add debugfs entries later. */
> +	if (!shrinker_debugfs_root)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	id = ida_alloc(&shrinker_debugfs_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (id < 0)
> +		return id;
> +	shrinker->debugfs_id = id;
> +
> +	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d", id);
> +
> +	/* create debugfs entry */
> +	entry = debugfs_create_dir(buf, shrinker_debugfs_root);
> +	if (IS_ERR(entry)) {
> +		ida_free(&shrinker_debugfs_ida, id);
> +		return PTR_ERR(entry);
> +	}
> +	shrinker->debugfs_entry = entry;
> +
> +	debugfs_create_file("count", 0220, entry, shrinker,
> +			    &shrinker_debugfs_count_fops);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void shrinker_debugfs_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +
> +	if (!shrinker->debugfs_entry)
> +		return;
> +
> +	debugfs_remove_recursive(shrinker->debugfs_entry);
> +	ida_free(&shrinker_debugfs_ida, shrinker->debugfs_id);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init shrinker_debugfs_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct shrinker *shrinker;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!debugfs_initialized())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

Redundant check since it is checked in debugfs_create_dir().
So I think we could remove this.

> +	shrinker_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("shrinker", NULL);

We should use IS_ERR() to detect the error code.  So the following
check is wrong.

> +	if (!shrinker_debugfs_root)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Create debugfs entries for shrinkers registered at boot */
> +	ret = down_write_killable(&shrinker_rwsem);

How could we kill this process?  IIUC, late_initcall() is called
from early init process, there is no way to kill this. Right?
If yes, I think we could just use down_write().

Thanks.

> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list)
> +		if (!shrinker->debugfs_entry)
> +			ret = shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
> +	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +late_initcall(shrinker_debugfs_init);
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index c6918fff06e1..024f7056b98c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ static void set_task_reclaim_state(struct task_struct *task,
>  	task->reclaim_state = rs;
>  }
>  
> -static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> -static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
> +LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
> +DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>  static int shrinker_nr_max;
> @@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
>  	list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
>  	shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker));
>  	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
>  }
>  
> @@ -682,6 +683,7 @@ void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>  	shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
>  	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
>  		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
> +	shrinker_debugfs_remove(shrinker);
>  	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
>  
>  	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
> -- 
> 2.35.3
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-22 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09 18:38 [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: introduce shrinker debugfs interface Roman Gushchin
2022-05-09 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mm: memcontrol: introduce mem_cgroup_ino() and mem_cgroup_get_from_ino() Roman Gushchin
2022-05-22  7:05   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-23 18:12     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-24  2:00       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-09 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: shrinkers: introduce debugfs interface for memory shrinkers Roman Gushchin
2022-05-20 16:45   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-05-21  0:27     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-20 16:58   ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-05-20 17:00     ` Kent Overstreet
2022-05-21  0:27     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-22 10:36   ` Muchun Song [this message]
2022-05-23 18:24     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-24  2:06       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-09 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: shrinkers: provide shrinkers with names Roman Gushchin
2022-05-20 16:41   ` Kent Overstreet
2022-05-21  0:31     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-22 11:08   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-23 22:06     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-24  9:12       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-22 22:13   ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-24  2:18     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-24 23:54       ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-09 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: docs: document shrinker debugfs Roman Gushchin
2022-05-09 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] tools: add memcg_shrinker.py Roman Gushchin
2022-05-09 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mm: shrinkers: add scan interface for shrinker debugfs Roman Gushchin
2022-05-22 11:35   ` Muchun Song
2022-05-23 20:54     ` Roman Gushchin
2022-05-24  2:23       ` Muchun Song
2022-05-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: introduce shrinker debugfs interface Roman Gushchin
2022-05-20  4:33   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YooSSCnphhuwfOOc@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.