All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
	Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
	v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs/9p: remove unecessary and overrestrictive check
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:45:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLX8xUdCRLYj3cjk@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230716-fixes-overly-restrictive-mmap-v1-1-0683b283b932@kernel.org>

Eric Van Hensbergen wrote on Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 04:29:00PM +0000:
> This eliminates a check for shared that was overrestrictive and
> duplicated a check in generic_file_readonly_mmap.

generic_file_readonly_mmap checks for VM_SHARED + VM_MAYWRITE,
so it isn't exactly "duplicating" the check.. But I agree we don't need
it; we used to have the mmap op be generic_file_readonly_mmap directly
previously.

I'd argue we don't need to invalidate inode pages either if there is no
writeback cache, there shouldn't be anything in it? but that can be done
separately, and extra invalidation won't bring harm anyway.

Reviewed-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
> index 2996fb00387fa..bda3abd6646b8 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
> @@ -506,8 +506,6 @@ v9fs_file_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  
>  	if (!(v9ses->cache & CACHE_WRITEBACK)) {
>  		p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_CACHE, "(no mmap mode)");
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
> -			return -ENODEV;
>  		invalidate_inode_pages2(filp->f_mapping);
>  		return generic_file_readonly_mmap(filp, vma);
>  	}
> 

-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-17 16:28 [PATCH 0/3] fs/9p: fix mmap regression Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-07-17 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs/9p: remove unecessary and overrestrictive check Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-07-18  2:45   ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2023-07-18  9:17     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-07-17 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs/9p: fix typo in comparison logic for cache mode Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-07-18  2:48   ` Dominique Martinet
2023-07-18  9:34     ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-07-17 16:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs/9p: fix type mismatch in file cache mode helper Eric Van Hensbergen
2023-07-18  2:50   ` Dominique Martinet
2023-07-18  9:40   ` Christian Schoenebeck
2023-07-19 14:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] fs/9p: fix mmap regression Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZLX8xUdCRLYj3cjk@codewreck.org \
    --to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
    --cc=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.