All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	don.brace@microsemi.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
	sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	bvanassche@acm.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de,
	shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com,
	megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set for when using shared sbitmap
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:16:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a10a20de-d8e2-8505-65ec-1c26bfbf6cfc@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1591810159-240929-7-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>

On 6/10/20 7:29 PM, John Garry wrote:
> For when using a shared sbitmap, no longer should the number of active
> request queues per hctx be relied on for when judging how to share the tag
> bitmap.
> 
> Instead maintain the number of active request queues per tag_set, and make
> the judgment based on that.
> 
> And since the blk_mq_tags.active_queues is no longer maintained, do not
> show it in debugfs.
> 
> Originally-from: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>   block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   block/blk-mq.c         |  2 ++
>   include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
>   include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>   5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> index 0fa3af41ab65..05b4be0c03d9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> @@ -458,17 +458,37 @@ static void blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(struct seq_file *m,
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static void blk_mq_debugfs_tags_shared_sbitmap_show(struct seq_file *m,
> +				     struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
> +{
> +	seq_printf(m, "nr_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_tags);
> +	seq_printf(m, "nr_reserved_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_reserved_tags);
> +
> +	seq_puts(m, "\nbitmap_tags:\n");
> +	sbitmap_queue_show(tags->bitmap_tags, m);
> +
> +	if (tags->nr_reserved_tags) {
> +		seq_puts(m, "\nbreserved_tags:\n");
> +		sbitmap_queue_show(tags->breserved_tags, m);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static int hctx_tags_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
>   {
>   	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data;
>   	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>   	int res;
>   
>   	res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   	if (res)
>   		goto out;
> -	if (hctx->tags)
> -		blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(m, hctx->tags);
> +	if (hctx->tags) {
> +		if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set))
> +			blk_mq_debugfs_tags_shared_sbitmap_show(m, hctx->tags);
> +		else
> +			blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(m, hctx->tags);
> +	}
>   	mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   
>   out:
> @@ -802,6 +822,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_shared_sbitmap_attrs
>   	{"dispatch", 0400, .seq_ops = &hctx_dispatch_seq_ops},
>   	{"busy", 0400, hctx_busy_show},
>   	{"ctx_map", 0400, hctx_ctx_map_show},
> +	{"tags", 0400, hctx_tags_show},
>   	{"sched_tags", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_show},
>   	{"sched_tags_bitmap", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_bitmap_show},
>   	{"io_poll", 0600, hctx_io_poll_show, hctx_io_poll_write},

I had been pondering this, too, when creating v6. Problem is that it'll 
show the tags per hctx, but as they are shared I guess the list looks 
pretty identical per hctx.
So I guess we should filter the tags per hctx to have only those active 
on that hctx displayed. But when doing so we can only print the 
in-flight tags, the others are not assigned to a hctx and as such we 
can't make a decision on which hctx they'll end up.

> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 7db16e49f6f6..6ca06b1c3a99 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,19 @@
>    */
>   bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>   {
> -	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
> -	    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> -		atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
> +
> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set)){
> +		if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags) &&
> +		    !test_and_set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags))
> +			atomic_inc(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap);
> +
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
> +		    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +			atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	}
>   
>   	return true;
>   }
At one point someone would need to educate me what this double 
'test_bit' and 'test_and_set_bit' is supposed to achieve.
Other than deliberately injecting a race condition ...

> @@ -47,11 +57,19 @@ void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool include_reserve)
>   void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>   {
>   	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
> -
> -	if (!test_and_clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> -		return;
> -
> -	atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues);
> +	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
> +
> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set)){
> +		if (!test_and_clear_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE,
> +					&q->queue_flags))
> +			return;
> +		atomic_dec(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap);
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_and_clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +			return;
> +		atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues);
> +	}
>   
>   	blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false);
>   }
> @@ -65,12 +83,11 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>   {
>   	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data->hctx;
>   	struct request_queue *q = data->q;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>   	unsigned int depth, users;
>   
>   	if (!hctx || !(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED))
>   		return true;
> -	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> -		return true;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Don't try dividing an ant
> @@ -78,7 +95,15 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>   	if (bt->sb.depth == 1)
>   		return true;
>   
> -	users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set)) {
> +		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags))
> +			return true;
> +		users = atomic_read(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap);
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +			return true;
> +		users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	}
>   	if (!users)
>   		return true;
>   
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 0f7e062a1665..f73a2f9c58bd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3350,6 +3350,8 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>   		goto out_free_mq_map;
>   
>   	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set)) {
> +		atomic_set(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap, 0);
> +
>   		if (!blk_mq_init_shared_sbitmap(set)) {
>   			ret = -ENOMEM;
>   			goto out_free_mq_rq_maps;
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 7b31cdb92a71..66711c7234db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct blk_mq_tag_set {
>   	unsigned int		timeout;
>   	unsigned int		flags;
>   	void			*driver_data;
> +	atomic_t		active_queues_shared_sbitmap;
>   
>   	struct sbitmap_queue	__bitmap_tags;
>   	struct sbitmap_queue	__breserved_tags;
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index c536278bec9e..1b0087e8d01a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -619,6 +619,7 @@ struct request_queue {
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_PCI_P2PDMA	25	/* device supports PCI p2p requests */
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_ZONE_RESETALL 26	/* supports Zone Reset All */
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_RQ_ALLOC_TIME 27	/* record rq->alloc_time_ns */
> +#define QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE 28	/* at least one blk-mq hctx is active */
>   
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_MQ_DEFAULT	((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) |		\
>   				 (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP))
> 
Other than that it looks fine.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-11 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 17:29 [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 01/12] blk-mq: rename BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED as BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 02/12] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth() John Garry
2020-06-11  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11  8:26     ` John Garry
2020-06-23 11:25       ` John Garry
2020-06-23 14:23         ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-24  8:13           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-29 16:18             ` John Garry
2020-08-10 16:51           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:01             ` John Garry
2020-08-11 16:34               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 03/12] blk-mq: Use pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 04/12] blk-mq: Facilitate a shared sbitmap per tagset John Garry
2020-06-11  3:37   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:09     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 05/12] blk-mq: Record nr_active_requests per queue for when using shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-06-11  4:04   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:16   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-06-11 14:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:33     ` John Garry
2020-06-12  6:06       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-29 15:32         ` About sbitmap_bitmap_show() and cleared bits (was Re: [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap) John Garry
2020-06-30  6:33           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-30  7:30             ` John Garry
2020-06-30 11:36               ` John Garry
2020-06-30 14:55           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  9:41         ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-07-13 12:20           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 08/12] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset' John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 09/12] scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters " John Garry
2020-07-02 10:23   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-06  8:23     ` John Garry
2020-07-06  8:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06  9:26         ` John Garry
2020-07-06  9:40           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06 19:19       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07  7:58         ` John Garry
2020-07-07 14:45           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07 16:17             ` John Garry
2020-07-09 19:01               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-10  8:10                 ` John Garry
2020-07-13  7:55                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-13  8:42                     ` John Garry
2020-07-19 19:07                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  7:23                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  9:18                         ` John Garry
2020-07-21  1:13                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-21  6:53                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  4:12                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  5:30                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  8:04                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  9:32                                   ` John Garry
2020-07-23 14:07                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-23 17:29                                       ` John Garry
2020-07-24  2:47                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  7:54                                           ` John Garry
2020-07-28  8:45                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29  5:25                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-29 15:36                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29 18:31                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-04  8:36                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-04  9:27                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-05  8:40                                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 10:25                                                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 13:38                                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 14:37                                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 15:29                                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-08 19:05                                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-09  2:16                                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-10 16:38                                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:09                                                                         ` John Garry
2020-08-04 17:00                                               ` John Garry
2020-08-05  2:56                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  8:01                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-08 11:31         ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 11/12] smartpqi: enable host tagset John Garry
2020-07-14 13:16   ` John Garry
2020-07-14 13:31     ` John Garry
2020-07-14 18:16       ` Don.Brace
2020-07-15  7:28         ` John Garry
2020-07-14 14:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-18  8:33       ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 12/12] hpsa: enable host_tagset and switch to MQ John Garry
2020-07-14  7:37   ` John Garry
2020-07-14  7:41     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14  7:52       ` John Garry
2020-07-14  8:06         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14  9:53           ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:14             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:43               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:19             ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:35               ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:44               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:52                 ` John Garry
2020-07-14 12:04                   ` Ming Lei
2020-08-03 20:39         ` Don.Brace
2020-08-04  9:27           ` John Garry
2020-08-04 15:18             ` Don.Brace
2020-08-05 11:21               ` John Garry
2020-08-14 21:04                 ` Don.Brace
2020-08-17  8:00                   ` John Garry
2020-08-17 18:39                     ` Don.Brace
2020-08-18  7:14                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-16 16:14     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-16 19:45     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-17 10:11       ` John Garry
2020-06-11  3:07 ` [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs Ming Lei
2020-06-11  9:35   ` John Garry
2020-06-12 18:47     ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-15  2:13       ` Ming Lei
2020-06-15  6:57         ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-16  1:00           ` Ming Lei
2020-06-17 11:26             ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-22  6:24               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-23  0:55                 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-23 11:50                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-23 12:11                   ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a10a20de-d8e2-8505-65ec-1c26bfbf6cfc@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=esc.storagedev@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.