All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@cloud.ionos.com>
To: Adam Goode <agoode@google.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Broken pixel format for Elgato Cam Link 4K
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 20:34:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a443a3e8633b9be921b365764147f296d0f16f76.camel@debian.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOf41N=PopZ=8_05e9WfvWkBhuN5iRq1=JJ2KqkLJE5S3-XW5A@mail.gmail.com>

Am Freitag, den 20.11.2020, 16:45 -0500 schrieb Adam Goode:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:52 PM Benjamin Drung
> <benjamin.drung@cloud.ionos.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I own an Elgato Cam Link 4K which is a very popular USB HDMI
> > capture
> > device (number one capture card by click rates on Geizhals [1]).
> > The
> > problem is that the video feed is distorted when using the
> > /dev/videoX
> > device in the browser (tested on Firefox and Chromium) for video
> > conferencing (tested with Jitsi Meet and Google Meet). The same
> > distortion is present when opening `v4l2:///dev/video0` with VLC.
> > 
> > The Elgato Cam Link 4K reports to have three different pixel
> > formats:
> > 
> > ```
> > $ v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video0 --list-formats-ext
> > ioctl: VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT
> >         Type: Video Capture
> > 
> >         [0]: 'NV12' (Y/CbCr 4:2:0)
> >                 Size: Discrete 3840x2160
> >                         Interval: Discrete 0.040s (25.000 fps)
> >         [1]: 'NV12' (Y/CbCr 4:2:0)
> >                 Size: Discrete 3840x2160
> >                         Interval: Discrete 0.040s (25.000 fps)
> >         [2]: 'YU12' (Planar YUV 4:2:0)
> >                 Size: Discrete 3840x2160
> >                         Interval: Discrete 0.040s (25.000 fps)
> > ```
> > 
> > When specifying the video format 'YU12' to VLC, the video is
> > distorted
> > the same way as using the default video format. When specifying
> > 'NV12'
> > to VLC, the video feed is displayed correctly:
> > 
> > ```
> > vlc v4l2:///dev/video0 --v4l2-chroma=NV12
> > ```
> > 
> > In OBS, the video feed is always displayed correctly. All video
> > formats
> > 'Y/CbCr 4:2:0', 'Planar YUV 4:2:0', 'BGR3 (Emulated)', and 'YV12
> > (Emulated)' combined with the color ranges 'Default', 'Partial',
> > and
> > 'Full' produce the same correct output.
> > 
> > With Linux >= 5.9 this behavior in OBS changes: The video format
> > 'Y/CbCr 4:2:0' displays the video correctly. Switching to 'Planar
> > YUV
> > 4:2:0', 'BGR3 (Emulated)', or 'YV12 (Emulated)' shows the video
> > distorted and OBS shows this error message:
> > 
> > ```
> > info: v4l2-input: Pixelformat: NV12
> > [...]
> > libv4l2: error set_fmt gave us a different result than try_fmt!
> > info: v4l2-input: Resolution: 3840x2160
> > info: v4l2-input: Pixelformat: NV12
> > ```
> > 
> > Changing the video format back does not have an effect until I also
> > change the color range (does seem to be relevant what to select
> > there).
> > 
> > Workaround
> > ----------
> > 
> > You can create a v4l2loopback device and use ffmpeg to stream from
> > the
> > Cam Link 4K to the loopback device:
> > 
> > ```
> > ffmpeg -f v4l2 -input_format yuv420p -video_size 3840x2160 \
> >   -i "$camlink" -codec copy -f v4l2 "$loopdev"
> > ```
> > 
> > This workaround works, but is cumbersome and burns CPU cycles.
> > 
> > Other reports
> > -------------
> > 
> > Searching the web for "Cam Link 4K Linux" reveals many similar
> > reports
> > like this. Noteworthy is blog post [3] from Mike Walters who
> > patched
> > the Cam Link 4K firmware to report the correct video format. I am
> > willing to debug this issue and do test, but I don't want to flash
> > the
> > firmware to not break the warrenty (bisides I lack the hardware for
> > flashing).
> > 
> > Environment
> > -----------
> > 
> > This problem is present in Ubuntu 20.04 with linux 5.4.0-54.60 and
> > Ubuntu 20.10 with linux 5.8.0-29.31. I also tested the mainline
> > kernels
> > builds 5.9.8-050908.202011101634 and 5.10.0-051000rc4.202011152030
> > from
> > Ubuntu [2].
> > 
> > The Cam Link 4K shows follow entries in dmesg:
> > 
> > ```
> > [    1.575753] usb 2-3: new SuperSpeed Gen 1 USB device number 2
> > using xhci_hcd
> > [    1.596664] usb 2-3: LPM exit latency is zeroed, disabling LPM.
> > [    1.598557] usb 2-3: New USB device found, idVendor=0fd9,
> > idProduct=0066, bcdDevice= 0.00
> > [    1.598558] usb 2-3: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
> > SerialNumber=4
> > [    1.598559] usb 2-3: Product: Cam Link 4K
> > [    1.598560] usb 2-3: Manufacturer: Elgato
> > ```
> > 
> > I have another problems with 5.9.8-050908.202011101634 and 5.10.0-
> > 051000rc4.202011152030: Chromium fail to access the video device of
> > Cam
> > Link 4K and the notebook integrated webcam has a too low
> > brightness.
> > 
> > [1] https://geizhals.de/?cat=vidext
> > [2] https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/
> > [3] 
> > https://assortedhackery.com/patching-cam-link-to-play-nicer-on-linux/
> > 
> > --
> > Benjamin Drung
> > Debian & Ubuntu Developer
> > 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am running on Fedora 32 which has the fix I wrote for the buggy
> elgato firmware. The bug in the firmware makes it impossible to
> properly select a non-0 pixel format when following the UVC
> negotiation protocol. This is because the firmware returns the pixel
> format in the wrong byte of the packet. The driver was following the
> UVC protocol but did not send the pixel format back to the v4l2
> subsystem. It does that now.
> 
> I'm not surprised that other bugs are emerging now. Ultimately the
> firmware is buggy and announces pixel formats that it then rejects.
> If
> I flip through the settings in OBS, I do manage to wedge the
> interface. But most of the programs I've seen that use v4l2 are buggy
> in this way. A reliable one is the qv4l2 test program. I've also had
> no problems with Chromium.
> 
> That reverse engineering is interesting! But I think it hides the
> real
> problem, where the pixel format negotiation on the firmware writes
> into the wrong byte of the packet.

Hi Adam,

you are talking about commit ec2c23f628802317f73fab5255cc62a776bc7930
and 8a652a17e3c005dcdae31b6c8fdf14382a29cbbe that are part of
v5.10-rc1?

What do you suggest to fix the issue? Should I contact Elgato
requesting a firmware update? Can the kernel ship a quirk for the Cam
Link 4K to workaround the firmware bug? I would be happy to try out
patches.

I tested the qv4l2 with Linux 5.10.0-051000rc4.202011152030. When using
the default settings, it displays the video correctly, but with a
vertical green one-pixel-wide line. The terminal prints "error" four
times. Sadly there is no debug mode to figure out where that error
comes from.

Selecting "YU12 (Planar YUV 4:2:0)" print the following error message
and switches back to the previous format:

libv4l2: error set_fmt gave us a different result than try_fmt!

--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-22 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-20 18:52 PROBLEM: Broken pixel format for Elgato Cam Link 4K Benjamin Drung
2020-11-20 21:45 ` Adam Goode
2020-11-22 19:34   ` Benjamin Drung [this message]
2020-11-23 15:02     ` Adam Goode
2021-04-06 18:52       ` [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix pixel format change " Benjamin Drung
2021-06-04 17:19       ` Benjamin Drung
2021-06-04 22:21         ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-05  8:19           ` Benjamin Drung
2021-06-05 21:51             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-05 23:10               ` Benjamin Drung
2021-06-05 20:05           ` [PATCH v3] " Benjamin Drung
2021-06-05 20:13           ` Benjamin Drung
2021-06-05 20:15           ` [PATCH v4] " Benjamin Drung
2021-06-05 21:56             ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-06-05 22:58               ` Benjamin Drung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a443a3e8633b9be921b365764147f296d0f16f76.camel@debian.org \
    --to=benjamin.drung@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=agoode@google.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.