From: syzbot <syzbot+b6ccd31787585244a855@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, fmdefrancesco@gmail.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, slava@dubeyko.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in hfsplus_block_allocate
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 05:38:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0000000000009c31e605ee9c1a13@google.com> (raw)
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 6d464646530f Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12cf5fed880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=54b747d981acc7b7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b6ccd31787585244a855
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/d75f5f77b3a3/disk-6d464646.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9382f86e4d95/vmlinux-6d464646.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/cf2b5f0d51dd/Image-6d464646.gz.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+b6ccd31787585244a855@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-32662-g6d464646530f #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/11346 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000fce298f8 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_block_allocate+0x60/0x5e4 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000fd681b08 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x8c/0x88c fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
hfsplus_get_block+0x17c/0x8a4 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260
block_read_full_folio+0x188/0x8c0 fs/buffer.c:2271
hfsplus_read_folio+0x28/0x38 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:28
filemap_read_folio+0xc4/0x468 mm/filemap.c:2407
do_read_cache_folio+0x1c8/0x588 mm/filemap.c:3534
do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3576 [inline]
read_cache_page+0x40/0x174 mm/filemap.c:3585
read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:756 [inline]
hfsplus_block_allocate+0x80/0x5e4 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:37
hfsplus_file_extend+0x560/0x88c fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
hfsplus_get_block+0x1c0/0x8a4 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:245
__block_write_begin_int+0x23c/0x9d4 fs/buffer.c:1991
__block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2041 [inline]
block_write_begin+0x74/0x14c fs/buffer.c:2102
cont_write_begin+0xf4/0x11c fs/buffer.c:2456
hfsplus_write_begin+0x64/0xac fs/hfsplus/inode.c:52
generic_perform_write+0xf0/0x2cc mm/filemap.c:3753
__generic_file_write_iter+0xd8/0x21c mm/filemap.c:3881
generic_file_write_iter+0x6c/0x168 mm/filemap.c:3913
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2191 [inline]
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
vfs_write+0x2dc/0x46c fs/read_write.c:584
ksys_write+0xb4/0x160 fs/read_write.c:637
__do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:649 [inline]
__se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:646 [inline]
__arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x34 fs/read_write.c:646
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
-> #0 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x3084 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
hfsplus_block_allocate+0x60/0x5e4 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35
hfsplus_file_extend+0x560/0x88c fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x6c/0x120 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358
hfsplus_create_cat+0xa4/0x38c fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:272
hfsplus_fill_super+0x758/0x864 fs/hfsplus/super.c:560
mount_bdev+0x1b8/0x210 fs/super.c:1401
hfsplus_mount+0x44/0x58 fs/hfsplus/super.c:641
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1531
do_new_mount+0x1dc/0x4e4 fs/namespace.c:3040
path_mount+0x358/0x890 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex);
lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by syz-executor.1/11346:
#0: ffff0001056de0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#53/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xf8/0x430 fs/super.c:228
#1: ffff0000fce29998 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_fill_super+0x72c/0x864 fs/hfsplus/super.c:553
#2: ffff0001056dc0b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0xac/0xc8
#3: ffff0000fd681b08 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x8c/0x88c fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11346 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-32662-g6d464646530f #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2055
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x3084 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
hfsplus_block_allocate+0x60/0x5e4 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35
hfsplus_file_extend+0x560/0x88c fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x6c/0x120 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358
hfsplus_create_cat+0xa4/0x38c fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:272
hfsplus_fill_super+0x758/0x864 fs/hfsplus/super.c:560
mount_bdev+0x1b8/0x210 fs/super.c:1401
hfsplus_mount+0x44/0x58 fs/hfsplus/super.c:641
legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x74 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x40/0x140 fs/super.c:1531
do_new_mount+0x1dc/0x4e4 fs/namespace.c:3040
path_mount+0x358/0x890 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mount+0x2c4/0x3c4 fs/namespace.c:3568
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
hfsplus: b-tree write err: -5, ino 4
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
next reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 13:38 syzbot [this message]
2024-03-13 22:37 ` [syzbot] [hfs?] possible deadlock in hfsplus_block_allocate syzbot
2024-03-14 8:20 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0000000000009c31e605ee9c1a13@google.com \
--to=syzbot+b6ccd31787585244a855@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.