* [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
@ 2021-12-21 3:04 syzbot
2021-12-21 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 9:52 ` syzbot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2021-12-21 3:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 07f8c60fe60f Add linux-next specific files for 20211220
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1355d295b00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2060504830b9124a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8836466a79f4175961b0
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12058fcbb00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17141adbb00000
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f]
CPU: 1 PID: 3602 Comm: syz-executor484 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5-next-20211220-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:set_task_ioprio+0x2de/0x620 block/blk-ioc.c:289 block/blk-ioc.c:289
Code: 4c 8b ab 18 12 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 9b 01 00 00 e8 d7 1e a4 fd 49 8d 7d 0c 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 01 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001b1fe90 EFLAGS: 00010203
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88801f888000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff83d3f779 RDI: 000000000000000c
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff8ffaf957
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88801f888948 R15: ffff88801f889218
FS: 0000555556a34300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f2155cab01d CR3: 00000000149ed000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__do_sys_ioprio_set+0x586/0xae0 block/ioprio.c:124 block/ioprio.c:124
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f2155c67cf9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 b1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffc6f0f50c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000fb
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000cbcf RCX: 00007f2155c67cf9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc6f0f5268 R09: 00007ffc6f0f5268
R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc6f0f50dc
R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:set_task_ioprio+0x2de/0x620 block/blk-ioc.c:289 block/blk-ioc.c:289
Code: 4c 8b ab 18 12 00 00 4d 85 ed 0f 84 9b 01 00 00 e8 d7 1e a4 fd 49 8d 7d 0c 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 01 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001b1fe90 EFLAGS: 00010203
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88801f888000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff83d3f779 RDI: 000000000000000c
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff8ffaf957
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88801f888948 R15: ffff88801f889218
FS: 0000555556a34300(0000) GS:ffff8880b9d00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f2155cab01d CR3: 00000000149ed000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 4c 8b ab 18 12 00 00 mov 0x1218(%rbx),%r13
7: 4d 85 ed test %r13,%r13
a: 0f 84 9b 01 00 00 je 0x1ab
10: e8 d7 1e a4 fd callq 0xfda41eec
15: 49 8d 7d 0c lea 0xc(%r13),%rdi
19: 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0xdffffc0000000000,%rax
20: fc ff df
23: 48 89 fa mov %rdi,%rdx
26: 48 c1 ea 03 shr $0x3,%rdx
* 2a: 0f b6 14 02 movzbl (%rdx,%rax,1),%edx <-- trapping instruction
2e: 48 89 f8 mov %rdi,%rax
31: 83 e0 07 and $0x7,%eax
34: 83 c0 01 add $0x1,%eax
37: 38 d0 cmp %dl,%al
39: 7c 08 jl 0x43
3b: 84 d2 test %dl,%dl
3d: 0f .byte 0xf
3e: 85 ef test %ebp,%edi
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 4c 8b ab 18 12 00 00 mov 0x1218(%rbx),%r13
7: 4d 85 ed test %r13,%r13
a: 0f 84 9b 01 00 00 je 0x1ab
10: e8 d7 1e a4 fd callq 0xfda41eec
15: 49 8d 7d 0c lea 0xc(%r13),%rdi
19: 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 movabs $0xdffffc0000000000,%rax
20: fc ff df
23: 48 89 fa mov %rdi,%rdx
26: 48 c1 ea 03 shr $0x3,%rdx
* 2a: 0f b6 14 02 movzbl (%rdx,%rax,1),%edx <-- trapping instruction
2e: 48 89 f8 mov %rdi,%rax
31: 83 e0 07 and $0x7,%eax
34: 83 c0 01 add $0x1,%eax
37: 38 d0 cmp %dl,%al
39: 7c 08 jl 0x43
3b: 84 d2 test %dl,%dl
3d: 0f .byte 0xf
3e: 85 ef test %ebp,%edi
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 3:04 [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio syzbot
@ 2021-12-21 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 5:21 ` syzbot
2021-12-21 9:52 ` syzbot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-12-21 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot, linux-block, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
On 12/20/21 8:04 PM, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 07f8c60fe60f Add linux-next specific files for 20211220
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1355d295b00000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2060504830b9124a
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8836466a79f4175961b0
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12058fcbb00000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17141adbb00000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
#syz test git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block for-next
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2021-12-21 5:21 ` syzbot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2021-12-21 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe, linux-block, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue:
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested on:
commit: e1ad6d38 Merge branch 'for-5.17/block' into for-next
git tree: git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block for-next
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f22078a087d573ce
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8836466a79f4175961b0
compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 3:04 [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio syzbot
2021-12-21 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2021-12-21 9:52 ` syzbot
2021-12-21 10:44 ` Eric Dumazet
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2021-12-21 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe, changbin.du, christian.brauner, daniel, davem, edumazet,
hkallweit1, kuba, linux-block, linux-kernel, netdev,
syzkaller-bugs, yajun.deng
syzbot has bisected this issue to:
commit e4b8954074f6d0db01c8c97d338a67f9389c042f
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Tue Dec 7 01:30:37 2021 +0000
netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=10620fcdb00000
start commit: 07f8c60fe60f Add linux-next specific files for 20211220
git tree: linux-next
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=12620fcdb00000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14620fcdb00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2060504830b9124a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8836466a79f4175961b0
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12058fcbb00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17141adbb00000
Reported-by: syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: e4b8954074f6 ("netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info")
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 9:52 ` syzbot
@ 2021-12-21 10:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-12-21 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2021-12-21 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Jens Axboe, changbin.du, Christian Brauner, Daniel Borkmann,
David Miller, Heiner Kallweit, Jakub Kicinski, linux-block, LKML,
netdev, syzkaller-bugs, Yajun Deng
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:52 AM syzbot
<syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>
> commit e4b8954074f6d0db01c8c97d338a67f9389c042f
> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 7 01:30:37 2021 +0000
>
> netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info
>
Unfortunately this commit will be in the way of many bisections.
Real bug was added in
commit 5fc11eebb4a98df5324a4de369bb5ab7f0007ff7
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Thu Dec 9 07:31:29 2021 +0100
block: open code create_task_io_context in set_task_ioprio
The flow in set_task_ioprio can be simplified by simply open coding
create_task_io_context, which removes a refcount roundtrip on the I/O
context.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209063131.18537-10-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=10620fcdb00000
> start commit: 07f8c60fe60f Add linux-next specific files for 20211220
> git tree: linux-next
> final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=12620fcdb00000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14620fcdb00000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2060504830b9124a
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8836466a79f4175961b0
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12058fcbb00000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17141adbb00000
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: e4b8954074f6 ("netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info")
>
> For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 10:44 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2021-12-21 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-12-21 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet, syzbot, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: changbin.du, Christian Brauner, Daniel Borkmann, David Miller,
Heiner Kallweit, Jakub Kicinski, linux-block, LKML, netdev,
syzkaller-bugs, Yajun Deng
On 12/21/21 3:44 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:52 AM syzbot
> <syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>>
>> commit e4b8954074f6d0db01c8c97d338a67f9389c042f
>> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Date: Tue Dec 7 01:30:37 2021 +0000
>>
>> netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info
>>
>
> Unfortunately this commit will be in the way of many bisections.
>
> Real bug was added in
>
> commit 5fc11eebb4a98df5324a4de369bb5ab7f0007ff7
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Thu Dec 9 07:31:29 2021 +0100
>
> block: open code create_task_io_context in set_task_ioprio
>
> The flow in set_task_ioprio can be simplified by simply open coding
> create_task_io_context, which removes a refcount roundtrip on the I/O
> context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209063131.18537-10-hch@lst.de
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
There are only really 5 patches in between the broken commit and the one
that fixes it, and it only affects things trying to set the ioprio with
a dead task. Is this a huge issue? I don't see why this would cause a
lot of bisection headaches.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2021-12-21 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-12-21 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2021-12-21 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: syzbot, Christoph Hellwig, changbin.du, Christian Brauner,
Daniel Borkmann, David Miller, Heiner Kallweit, Jakub Kicinski,
linux-block, LKML, netdev, syzkaller-bugs, Yajun Deng
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:25 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 12/21/21 3:44 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:52 AM syzbot
> > <syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
> >>
> >> commit e4b8954074f6d0db01c8c97d338a67f9389c042f
> >> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >> Date: Tue Dec 7 01:30:37 2021 +0000
> >>
> >> netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info
> >>
> >
> > Unfortunately this commit will be in the way of many bisections.
> >
> > Real bug was added in
> >
> > commit 5fc11eebb4a98df5324a4de369bb5ab7f0007ff7
> > Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Date: Thu Dec 9 07:31:29 2021 +0100
> >
> > block: open code create_task_io_context in set_task_ioprio
> >
> > The flow in set_task_ioprio can be simplified by simply open coding
> > create_task_io_context, which removes a refcount roundtrip on the I/O
> > context.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209063131.18537-10-hch@lst.de
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>
> There are only really 5 patches in between the broken commit and the one
> that fixes it, and it only affects things trying to set the ioprio with
> a dead task. Is this a huge issue? I don't see why this would cause a
> lot of bisection headaches.
>
I was saying that my commit was polluting syzbot bisection, this is a
distraction in this report.
(Or if you prefer, please ignore syzbot bisection)
linux-next has still this bug in set_task_ioprio()
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio
2021-12-21 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2021-12-21 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-12-21 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: syzbot, Christoph Hellwig, changbin.du, Christian Brauner,
Daniel Borkmann, David Miller, Heiner Kallweit, Jakub Kicinski,
linux-block, LKML, netdev, syzkaller-bugs, Yajun Deng
On 12/21/21 9:03 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:25 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 12/21/21 3:44 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:52 AM syzbot
>>> <syzbot+8836466a79f4175961b0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>>>>
>>>> commit e4b8954074f6d0db01c8c97d338a67f9389c042f
>>>> Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>>>> Date: Tue Dec 7 01:30:37 2021 +0000
>>>>
>>>> netlink: add net device refcount tracker to struct ethnl_req_info
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this commit will be in the way of many bisections.
>>>
>>> Real bug was added in
>>>
>>> commit 5fc11eebb4a98df5324a4de369bb5ab7f0007ff7
>>> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>> Date: Thu Dec 9 07:31:29 2021 +0100
>>>
>>> block: open code create_task_io_context in set_task_ioprio
>>>
>>> The flow in set_task_ioprio can be simplified by simply open coding
>>> create_task_io_context, which removes a refcount roundtrip on the I/O
>>> context.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209063131.18537-10-hch@lst.de
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>>
>> There are only really 5 patches in between the broken commit and the one
>> that fixes it, and it only affects things trying to set the ioprio with
>> a dead task. Is this a huge issue? I don't see why this would cause a
>> lot of bisection headaches.
>>
>
> I was saying that my commit was polluting syzbot bisection, this is a
> distraction in this report.
> (Or if you prefer, please ignore syzbot bisection)
Ah got it, yes makes sense.
> linux-next has still this bug in set_task_ioprio()
linux-next often trails by a few days, once it catches up hopefully
this will be behind us.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-21 16:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-21 3:04 [syzbot] general protection fault in set_task_ioprio syzbot
2021-12-21 3:34 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 5:21 ` syzbot
2021-12-21 9:52 ` syzbot
2021-12-21 10:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-12-21 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-21 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-12-21 16:30 ` Jens Axboe
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.