From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932449Ab3D3Ocw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:32:52 -0400
Received: from a10-48.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.10.48]:41616 "EHLO
	a10-48.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932421Ab3D3Ocs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:32:48 -0400
X-Greylist: delayed 350 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:32:48 EDT
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:26:56 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc: glommer@parallels.com, penberg@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next-20130422] Bug in SLAB?
In-Reply-To: <201304300645.FCE37285.tVHJLSOMQFOFFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Message-ID: <0000013e5b56d067-7982dfa6-08a2-4c48-ad77-6888b5114c5f-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <CAOJsxLFYDC+EDdJrXVnc1qfEyd56bhFLeGE+6Mbhwiq73KQQLQ@mail.gmail.com> <517E8758.9040803@parallels.com> <0000013e564e0e5a-121c52f9-e489-470f-99d5-67a5ad42eb75-000000@email.amazonses.com> <201304300028.IAD13051.OHOVMJSLFFFQOt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
 <0000013e56e9304a-1042a95a-d4dd-43c5-8b8a-c670f50ac54e-000000@email.amazonses.com> <201304300645.FCE37285.tVHJLSOMQFOFFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SES-Outgoing: 2013.04.30-54.240.10.48
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

> The testcases still trigger BUG() at 32M:

I thought we established that MAX_ORDER only allows a maximum of 8M sized
allocations? Why are you trying 32M?

The BUG() should trigger for these allocations.