From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758068Ab3EGPrw (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 11:47:52 -0400 Received: from a9-78.smtp-out.amazonses.com ([54.240.9.78]:36942 "EHLO a9-78.smtp-out.amazonses.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757775Ab3EGPrv (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 11:47:51 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 320 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 11:47:51 EDT Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:40:37 +0000 From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: Pekka Enberg cc: Tetsuo Handa , Glauber Costa , LKML Subject: Re: [linux-next-20130422] Bug in SLAB? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <0000013e7fa6ca33-aa0a34a3-0179-4354-a1e7-b22e5f3570cd-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <0000013e5b56d067-7982dfa6-08a2-4c48-ad77-6888b5114c5f-000000@email.amazonses.com> <201305010101.CGB86424.JFQOtSFOVOLFHM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <0000013e5bfc7c4d-54fa9464-dccd-4157-b4a5-22594261eaf3-000000@email.amazonses.com> <201305012114.AED78178.tFSHFQOOJLMOFV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <0000013e6705da99-094923c6-e239-43d2-8f0c-5e661656a27c-000000@email.amazonses.com> <201305031726.BJG78631.tQSOVOLHJFMFFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <0000013e6b90e65e-e0e184d9-7da5-4873-9572-3b40958552e2-000000@email.amazonses.com> <0000013e7f60169e-47b0bd92-a757-41da-8b30-fa78511fe298-000000@email.amazonses.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SES-Outgoing: 2013.05.07-54.240.9.78 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 May 2013, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > Well this is because you did not take the patch that changed the way > > KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH is treated. > > Is that still needed? I only took the ones Tetsuo said were needed to > fix the issue at hand. If his tests work then I guess not. Queue for later.