From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [212.105.56.244] (helo=dmz.lumentis.net) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #5 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1AgOUM-0006Ib-8C for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:21:46 +0000 From: "Joakim Tjernlund" To: "'Jarkko Lavinen \(NMP/Helsinki\)'" , "'MTD List'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <000601c3d9d7$d770b630$0a01a8c0@LUMENTIS02> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20040113125031.GA5146@angel.research.nokia.com> Subject: RE: JFFS2 mount time Reply-To: joakim.tjernlund@lumentis.se List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I am working with an embedded device with 64MB nand chip. I am able to > read from chip at 6MB/s and able to read the whole chip in 10 seconds > using character mtd device. The device has Omap1610 running at 190MHz, > kernel 2.4.21. > > With 80% file system usage the mount time is 8 seconds which is > unacceptable for root file system on a handheld device. I assume the > scan time is linear with respect to the size of the flash partition > and the file system usage. > > Is there anything that could be done to reduce the mount time of large > JFFS2 partitions? Lazy mounting with prioritized scanning? Yes, it is already done in JFFS2 CVS. Mount time for me is about a second on a 64MB JFFS2 NOR flash. Jocke