From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:19:39 -0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex In-Reply-To: <20110125141153.GA17286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123001636.GA20841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$@deacon@arm.com> <20110125141153.GA17286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <000c01cbbc9a$e71faf70$b55f0e50$@deacon@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > I've tested this on the Versatile Express (ca9x4, little endian) with a USB > > hard drive and ext3 (rw) filesystem. I did a bunch of parallel dds of a 2GB > > file containing random data whilst the system was fairly loaded. File checksums > > all passed and the kernel didn't do anything untowards. > > > > Tested-by: Will Deacon > > > > I appreciate this is the same test configuration as the one Nicolas did, > > but it at least replicates his findings. > > Was this for just the first three or the complete set? This was for your -devel branch as of last night (head 75c4aa97). If I try to extract patches from the mailing list, Exchange destroys them :( Will