All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@gmail.com>
To: "'Ian Jackson'" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
	"'Debian folks: Michael Tokarev'" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	"'Hans van Kranenburg'" <hans@knorrie.org>,
	"'Xen upstream folks with an interest: Andrew Cooper'"
	<Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"'Roger Pau Monné'" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"'My Xen upstream tools co-maintainer: Wei Liu'" <wl@xen.org>
Subject: RE: qemu and Xen ABI-unstable libs
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 08:36:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001b01d68fe9$fb3ae060$f1b0a120$@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24420.58027.291045.507128@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org> On Behalf Of Ian Jackson
> Sent: 18 September 2020 17:39
> To: Debian folks: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>; Hans van Kranenburg <hans@knorrie.org>; Xen
> upstream folks with an interest: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monné
> <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> Cc: pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; My Xen upstream tools co-
> maintainer: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
> Subject: RFC: qemu and Xen ABI-unstable libs
> 
> Hi all.  Michael Tokarev has been looking into the problem that qemu
> is using Xen libraries with usntable ABIs.  We did an experiment to
> see which abi-unstable symbols qemu links to, by suppressing libxc
> from the link line.  The results are below.[1]
> 
> Things are not looking too bad.  After some discussion on #xendevel I
> have tried to summarise the situation for each of the troublesome
> symbols.
> 
> Also, we discovered that upstream qemu does not link against any
> abi-unstable Xen libraries if PCI passthrough is disabled.
> 
> Please would my Xen colleages correct me if I have made any mistakes.
> Michael, I hope this is helpful and clear.
> 
> 
> In order from easy to hard:
> 
> 
> xc_domain_shutdown
> 
> This call in qemu needs to be replaced with a call to the existing
> function xendevicemodel_shutdown in libxendevicemodel.  I think it is
> likely that this call is fixed in qemu upstream.
> 

I just pulled QEMU master and it appears that destroy_hvm_domain() is still calling xc_domain_shutdown().

> 
> xc_get_hvm_param
> 
> There are three references in qemu's
> xen_get_default_ioreq_server_info, relating to ioreq servers.  These
> uses (and perhaps surrounding code at this function's call site)
> should be replaced by use of xendevicemodel_create_ioreq_server
> etc. from libxendevicemodel.  I think it is likely that this call is
> fixed in qemu upstream.
> 

These references are in compat code for Xen < 4.6. Use of (non-default) ioreq server has been present in the code for a long time.
We can remove them by retiring the compat code.

> 
> xc_physdev_map_pirq
> xc_physdev_map_pirq_msi
> xc_physdev_unmap_pirq
> 
> These are all small wrappers for the PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq hypercall.
> PHYSDEVOP is already reasonably abi-stable at the hypervisor level (in
> theory it's versioned, but changing it would break all dom0's).

The hypercalls are non-tools and directly called from the Linux kernel code so they are ABI.

> These calls could just be provided as-is by a new stable abi
> entrypoint.  We think this should probably go in libxendevicemodel.
> 

Rather than simply moving this calls into libxendevicemodel, we should think about their interactions with calls such as
xc_domain_bind_pt_pci_irq() below and maybe have a stable library that actually provides a better API/ABI for interrupt
mapping/triggering although... I've long felt PCI pass-through should not be done by QEMU anyway (not least because we currently
have no mechanism for PCI pass-through to PVH domains).

> So, what's needed is to make Xen upstream change to add versions of
> these three functions to tools/libs/devicemodel.  Change qemu to use
> them.
> 
> 
> xc_domain_iomem_permission
> xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact
> xc_domain_ioport_mapping
> xc_domain_memory_mapping
> 
> The things done by these calls in qemu should be done by the Xen
> toolstack (libxl), during domain creation etc., instead.

I don't think that is practical. E.g. if a guest re-programs a PCI I/O BAR then it may necessitate re-calling
xc_domain_ioport_mapping(); the tool-stack cannot know a priori where PCI BARs will end up in guest port/memory space.

> 
> For at least some of them, there are patches on xen-devel, see
>   From: Grzegorz Uriasz <gorbak25@gmail.com>
>   Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tools/libxl: Grant VGA IO port permission for
>    stubdom/target domain
>   Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:12:01 +0100
> et seq.  These patches have been reviewed and as far as I can tell
> from the thread we are awaiting a resend.
> 

For legacy ranges, such as VGA, it is practical.

> 
> xc_set_hvm_param
> 
> Two calls both relating to HVM_PARAM_ACPI_S_STATE.
> 
> These need to be turned into DMOP hypercalls (ie, new hypercalls added
> to the hypervisor) and entrypoints provided in libxendevicemodel.
> 

Yes, this is certainly a candidate for a DM op.

> 
> xc_domain_bind_pt_pci_irq
> xc_domain_unbind_msi_irq
> xc_domain_unbind_pt_irq
> xc_domain_update_msi_irq
> 
> These are currently XEN_DOMCTL_* hypercalls.  These do not have a
> stable ABI at the hypervisor interface.  AIUI Xen hypervisor folks
> think they should be changed to use the DMOP or PHYSDEVOP hypercalls.
> 
> Additionally, we need calls for these in a userspace library with a
> stable ABI.  We think that should be libxendevicemodel.
> 

What I said above: This needs more consideration.

A while ago I hacked together xenpt (https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/pauldu/xenpt.git), a stand-alone PCI pass-through
emulator. One option would be to get this into shape and pull it into the Xen tool-stack. This would facilitate removal of the PCI
pass-through code from QEMU and hence removal of use of unstable interfaces.

  Paul

> I think the userspace library part can go ahead right away: we can
> change the implementation to use DMOP when the hypervisor work is
> done.  In the meantime, the library would have a stable ABI for
> callers, but the implementation would be tied to the hypervisor ABI.
> 
> 
> xc_interface_close
> xc_interface_open
> 
> When everything else is done, these calls will no longer be needed
> because nothing will use the xc handle.
> 
> Ian.
> 
> 
> [1]
> 
> /usr/bin/ld: accel/xen/xen-all.o: in function `xen_init':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/accel/xen/xen-all.c:160: undefined reference to `xc_interface_open'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/accel/xen/xen-all.c:175: undefined reference to
> `xc_interface_close'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/accel/xen/xen-all.c:168: undefined reference to
> `xc_interface_close'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt.o: in function `xen_pt_destroy':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:725: undefined reference to `xc_domain_unbind_pt_irq'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:751: undefined reference to
> `xc_physdev_unmap_pirq'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt.o: in function `xen_pt_realize':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:866: undefined reference to `xc_physdev_map_pirq'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:885: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_bind_pt_pci_irq'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:898: undefined reference to
> `xc_physdev_unmap_pirq'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt.o: in function `xen_pt_region_update':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:631: undefined reference to `xc_domain_ioport_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt.c:643: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_memory_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.o: in function `xen_pt_register_vga_regions':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:68: undefined reference to `xc_domain_memory_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:63: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_ioport_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.o: in function `xen_pt_unregister_vga_regions':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:104: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_memory_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:99: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_ioport_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.o: in function `igd_write_opregion':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:260: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_iomem_permission'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:273: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_memory_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.o: in function `xen_pt_unregister_vga_regions':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_graphics.c:119: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_memory_mapping'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.o: in function `msi_msix_disable':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c:213: undefined reference to `xc_domain_unbind_msi_irq'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c:222: undefined reference to
> `xc_physdev_unmap_pirq'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.o: in function `msi_msix_setup':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c:138: undefined reference to `xc_physdev_map_pirq_msi'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.o: in function `msi_msix_update':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c:178: undefined reference to `xc_domain_update_msi_irq'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c:185: undefined reference to
> `xc_physdev_unmap_pirq'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.o: in function `xen_pt_msix_update_remap':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c:415: undefined reference to `xc_domain_unbind_pt_irq'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.o: in function `xen_ram_alloc':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:290: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.o: in function `xen_get_default_ioreq_server_info':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h:395: undefined reference to `xc_get_hvm_param'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h:403: undefined reference to
> `xc_get_hvm_param'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/include/hw/xen/xen_common.h:411: undefined reference to
> `xc_get_hvm_param'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.o: in function `destroy_hvm_domain':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:1551: undefined reference to `xc_interface_open'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:1555: undefined reference to
> `xc_domain_shutdown'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.o: in function `xen_wakeup_notifier':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:1317: undefined reference to `xc_set_hvm_param'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.o: in function `xen_suspend_notifier':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:183: undefined reference to `xc_set_hvm_param'
> /usr/bin/ld: hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.o: in function `destroy_hvm_domain':
> /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:1564: undefined reference to `xc_interface_close'
> /usr/bin/ld: /build/qemu/debian-qemu/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c:1564: undefined reference to
> `xc_interface_close'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> 
> List:
> xc_domain_bind_pt_pci_irq
> xc_domain_iomem_permission
> xc_domain_ioport_mapping
> xc_domain_memory_mapping
> xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact
> xc_domain_shutdown
> xc_domain_unbind_msi_irq
> xc_domain_unbind_pt_irq
> xc_domain_update_msi_irq
> xc_get_hvm_param
> xc_interface_close
> xc_interface_open
> xc_physdev_map_pirq
> xc_physdev_map_pirq_msi
> xc_physdev_unmap_pirq
> xc_set_hvm_param
> 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-21  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 16:39 RFC: qemu and Xen ABI-unstable libs Ian Jackson
2020-09-21  7:36 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2020-09-21  9:40   ` Jan Beulich
2020-09-21  9:50     ` Paul Durrant
2020-09-21 10:16   ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-09-21 10:36     ` Paul Durrant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001b01d68fe9$fb3ae060$f1b0a120$@xen.org' \
    --to=xadimgnik@gmail.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=hans@knorrie.org \
    --cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.