From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daryl@wideray.com>
Errors-To: <daryl@wideray.com>
From: "Daryl Van Vorst" <daryl@wideray.com>
To: "'Marcel Holtmann'" <marcel@rvs.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: "'BlueZ Mailing List'" <bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [Bluez-devel] RE: Qualification testing - rfcomm
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:07:29 -0700
Message-ID: <002401c34d5f$d576f240$5796fea9@baked>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To: <1058554741.25425.256.camel@pegasus>
List-ID: <bluez-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>

Marcel,

> > Just wanted to make sure that you saw this (not trying to 
> be pushy). 
> > :)
> > 
> > I haven't actually run into this problem with a real 
> product yet, but 
> > the rfcomm tester runs into it. So as far as qualification 
> goes, it's 
> > pretty marginal.
> 
> and that's the problem I don't find the part where it gets wrong :(

Do you mean you tried the aclsession script and didn't see the same send 5
frames, wait 20 sec, send 5 more etc problem?

> Did the other patch helped?

We haven't tested it yet...  I was hoping for a resolution to the above
problem before I sent updates for evaluation.

-Daryl.