From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266004AbTGNLN7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:13:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266018AbTGNLN7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:13:59 -0400 Received: from usti.fccps.cz ([194.108.74.250]:3070 "EHLO usti.fccps.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266004AbTGNLNz (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:13:55 -0400 Message-ID: <002a01c349fc$23a0e8c0$ec00000a@fccps.cz> From: "=?iso-8859-1?B?RnJhbnRpc2VrIFJ5c+FuZWs=?=" To: Cc: "Francois Romieu" , , References: <20030711212551.A25528@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Subject: Re: Why is generic hldc beig ignored? RE:Linux 2.4.22-pre4 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:36:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear Mr. Tosatti, I've been asked by Mr. Francois Romieu, the author of drivers/net/wan/dscc4.c, to give you a summary of my user-space experience with recent versions of dscc4.c and the Generic HDLC Layer (drivers/net/wan/hdlc_*.c, hdlc.o). The message is: it works, to the extent that it can be configured and TCP/IP works. I've tried DSCC4 hardware back-to-back and against a Cisco, in a few different configurations. I've tried the three basic encapsulations: cisco-hdlc, itu-hdlc and sync ppp. I don't know enough FR and X.25 to be able to come up with a workable setup (didn't even try). I was using linux 2.4.21-rc1 and 2.4.21 (release). This works, but that version of dscc4.c suffers from a hardware quirk in the DSCC4 hardware - the port/link cannot be reconfigured without a cold reboot. The effects of this quirk are alleviated by a patch to dscc4.c that has been submitted by F.Romieu for approval to the linux kernel and that reportedly has made i to the -ac series, but not to the vanilla 2.4.21. I have not touched the sources of the Generic HDLC Layer (hdlc*.c) that is present in 2.4.21-rc1 to 2.4.21. I was using the vanilla source without modification. I don't know about any differences in the hdlc*.c in the -ac series - I didn't investigate that flavor. As for the userspace sethdlc.c by Krzystof Halasa: I was using ver.1.12, modified by Mr. Romieu, who has "cut some non-compiling functionality." The current version from Krzysztof Halasa is 1.15. I barely had the time to test basic workability and document my test bench. Unfortunately I did not do any stress/long-term/feature-crosscompatibility testing. Specifically, I was using uniprocessor machines only (no SMP). I did not test all the features available in the Generic HDLC Layer, I don't even fully understand all the technologies covered - I was only interested in basic point-to-point IP over sync serial. I've written a short mini-HOWTO - the chapter on test results in terms of transfer rates and ping round trips is at http://sweb.cz/Frantisek.Rysanek/sync/dscc4+HDLC-Mini-HOWTO.html#Drivers.ope n.tests I hope that I was not completely wasting your time :-) If you have further questions, ask me. Thanks for the great job that you're doing. Sincerely yours Frank Rysanek ----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois Romieu" To: "Frantisek Rysánek" Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:25 PM Subject: [marcelo@conectiva.com.br: Re: Why is generic hldc beig ignored? RE:Linux 2.4.22-pre4] > Imho l-k is waiting for a summary of your experiences with post > 2.4.21-pre linux hdlc. > > Btw latest dscc4 updates are available in Alan Cox's -ac series. > > ----- Forwarded message from Marcelo Tosatti ----- > > From: Marcelo Tosatti > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:18:10 -0300 (BRT) > Subject: Re: Why is generic hldc beig ignored? RE:Linux 2.4.22-pre4 > X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva > To: Henrique Oliveira > Cc: Alan Cox , > Kevin Curtis , > lkml > References: <7C078C66B7752B438B88E11E5E20E72E25C978@GENERAL.farsite.co.uk> > > <003101c34712$a9b8f480$602fa8c0@henrique> <1057914760.8028.27.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> > <013901c347cd$44586f60$602fa8c0@henrique> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-28.7 required=4.0 > tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, > USER_AGENT_PINE,X_MAILING_LIST > version=2.53-fr_1 > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-fr_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) > > > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Henrique Oliveira wrote: > > > Hello !!! > > No offence here but the generic hdlc layer's been always confusing. I will > > write here what I believe is going on. > > Until version 2.4.20 we had the old hdlc layer, with only one source file > > hdlc.c. People that wanted to use the new hdlc layer had to apply a patch > > provided by Halasa or by the WAN cards vendors. The kernel 2.4.21 came out > > with the new hdlc layer, that includes a couple of files: hdlc_generic.c, > > hdlc_fr.c, hdlc_ppp.c, hdlc_raw.c, etc. I don't know the status of the -ac > > tree but I can say that the kernel 2.4.21 has the new code. > > The new hdlc layer really needs new tools. This new tool can (supposedly) be > > found at Halasa's web site. I don't know if someone has tested these tools > > but I am about to run a test this afternoon. If someone is interested on the > > results, just drop me a line. > > I am. > > Please report the results of your tests and CC lkml. > > And Alan, what the -ac tree hdlc changes are about ? > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > ----- End forwarded message -----