Re: [PATCH] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Use rcuidle tracepoints for rpmh

From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: Use rcuidle tracepoints for rpmh
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:23:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00798be85df85beff8edcf26767dddc2@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115013751.249588-1-swboyd@chromium.org>

On 2020-01-15 07:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This tracepoint is hit now that we call into the rpmh code from the cpu
> idle path. Let's move this to be an rcuidle tracepoint so that we avoid
> the RCU idle splat below
> 
>  =============================
>  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>  5.4.10 #68 Tainted: G S
>  -----------------------------
>  drivers/soc/qcom/trace-rpmh.h:72 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() 
> usage!
> 
>  other info that might help us debug this:
> 
>  RCU used illegally from idle CPU!
>  rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>  RCU used illegally from extended quiescent state!
>  5 locks held by swapper/2/0:
>   #0: ffffff81745d6ee8 (&(&genpd->slock)->rlock){+.+.}, at:
> genpd_lock_spin+0x1c/0x2c
>   #1: ffffff81745da6e8 (&(&genpd->slock)->rlock/1){....}, at:
> genpd_lock_nested_spin+0x24/0x34
>   #2: ffffff8174f2ca20 (&(&genpd->slock)->rlock/2){....}, at:
> genpd_lock_nested_spin+0x24/0x34
>   #3: ffffff8174f2c300 (&(&drv->client.cache_lock)->rlock){....}, at:
> rpmh_flush+0x48/0x24c
>   #4: ffffff8174f2c150 (&(&tcs->lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at:
> rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data+0x74/0x270
> 
>  stack backtrace:
>  CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G S                5.4.10 #68
>  Call trace:
>   dump_backtrace+0x0/0x174
>   show_stack+0x20/0x2c
>   dump_stack+0xc8/0x124
>   lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe4/0x104
>   __tcs_buffer_write+0x230/0x2d0
>   rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data+0x210/0x270
>   rpmh_flush+0x84/0x24c
>   rpmh_domain_power_off+0x78/0x98
>   _genpd_power_off+0x40/0xc0
>   genpd_power_off+0x168/0x208
>   genpd_power_off+0x1e0/0x208
>   genpd_power_off+0x1e0/0x208
>   genpd_runtime_suspend+0x1ac/0x220
>   __rpm_callback+0x70/0xfc
>   rpm_callback+0x34/0x8c
>   rpm_suspend+0x218/0x4a4
>   __pm_runtime_suspend+0x88/0xac
>   psci_enter_domain_idle_state+0x3c/0xb4
>   cpuidle_enter_state+0xb8/0x284
>   cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x4c
>   call_cpuidle+0x3c/0x68
>   do_idle+0x194/0x260
>   cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x28
>   secondary_start_kernel+0x150/0x15c
> 
> Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by 
> using genpd")
> Reported-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> I think the commit that this is "Fixes"ing is a stable commit, but I'm
> not positive.
> 
>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> index e278fc11fe5c..b71822131f59 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static void __tcs_buffer_write(struct rsc_drv
> *drv, int tcs_id, int cmd_id,
>  		write_tcs_cmd(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_MSGID, tcs_id, j, msgid);
>  		write_tcs_cmd(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_ADDR, tcs_id, j, cmd->addr);
>  		write_tcs_cmd(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_DATA, tcs_id, j, cmd->data);
> -		trace_rpmh_send_msg(drv, tcs_id, j, msgid, cmd);
> +		trace_rpmh_send_msg_rcuidle(drv, tcs_id, j, msgid, cmd);
>  	}
> 
>  	write_tcs_reg(drv, RSC_DRV_CMD_WAIT_FOR_CMPL, tcs_id, cmd_complete);

Thanks Stephen,

Tested-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation