From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5525C43144 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E32B26B2F for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:21:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6E32B26B2F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935699AbeFZNVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:21:50 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:14919 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934199AbeFZNVs (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:21:48 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jun 2018 06:21:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,274,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="235700121" Received: from skovflem-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.249.254.74]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jun 2018 06:21:41 -0700 Message-ID: <0084b7ca7e5b9a48f4f8354805eed8b3c44f90c3.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] tpm: rename tpm_chip_find_get() to tpm_find_get_ops() From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Stefan Berger , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:21:40 +0300 In-Reply-To: <55a1a67f9c53ad8cac6e560bb23b1b712fdd4caa.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20180626110619.2362791-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180626110619.2362791-2-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55a1a67f9c53ad8cac6e560bb23b1b712fdd4caa.camel@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.1-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 16:18 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 07:06 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > Rename tpm_chip_find_get() to tpm_find_get_ops() to more closely match > > the tpm_put_ops() counter part. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > > Awesome, makes sense by itself alone. Thanks Stefan. If we need > follow up versions, no need to include this patch. I would take > it even if the whole patch set was discarded for whatever reason. > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Already pushed to my master. Kind of waiting James to rebase his tree before moving stuff to next. /Jarkko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Sakkinen) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:21:40 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] tpm: rename tpm_chip_find_get() to tpm_find_get_ops() In-Reply-To: <55a1a67f9c53ad8cac6e560bb23b1b712fdd4caa.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <20180626110619.2362791-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180626110619.2362791-2-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55a1a67f9c53ad8cac6e560bb23b1b712fdd4caa.camel@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <0084b7ca7e5b9a48f4f8354805eed8b3c44f90c3.camel@linux.intel.com> To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 16:18 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 07:06 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > Rename tpm_chip_find_get() to tpm_find_get_ops() to more closely match > > the tpm_put_ops() counter part. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger > > Awesome, makes sense by itself alone. Thanks Stefan. If we need > follow up versions, no need to include this patch. I would take > it even if the whole patch set was discarded for whatever reason. > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Already pushed to my master. Kind of waiting James to rebase his tree before moving stuff to next. /Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html