From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760325Ab0JZX53 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:57:29 -0400 Received: from sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp ([203.211.202.206]:25052 "EHLO sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753799Ab0JZX51 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:57:27 -0400 Message-ID: <008e01cb7569$8a01a2d0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" To: "Jean Delvare" , "Wang Qi" , "Wang Yong Y" Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" , "Wolfram Sang" , "Ralf Baechle" , , "LKML" , "Ben Dooks " , "Linus Walleij" , "srinidhi kasagar" , "Tomoya MORINAGA" , , , References: <4CC645A1.5010509@dsn.okisemi.com><20101026102048.316d0c04@endymion.delvare><001a01cb74ec$e3eb3ea0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com><20101026111322.738b0b14@endymion.delvare><001c01cb74f2$d3dd8990$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> <20101026132649.623461f9@endymion.delvare> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_I2C driver to 2.6.36 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:57:22 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 X-Hosting-Pf: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:26 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > It's not mandatory, but the time Ben and myself have to review new > drivers is scarce, so it's in your own interest to have the code > reviewed by people with more time and more interest in the specific > hardware. I can only imagine that Intel wants Topcliff to be supported > as soon as possible by the Linux kernel, so they should certainly have > resources to allocate for the review and testing. I see. I will reuest Intel to review again and put signature. > Hi Qi and Yong Y Could you review this patch again and put signature? Thanks, Tomoya(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean Delvare" To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" ; "Wolfram Sang" ; "Ralf Baechle" ; ; "LKML" ; "Ben Dooks " ; "Linus Walleij" ; "srinidhi kasagar" ; "Tomoya MORINAGA" ; "Wang Qi" ; "Wang Yong Y" ; ; ; Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_I2C driver to 2.6.36 > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:47:37 +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:13 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > The _pch becomes redundant then, i2c-topcliff.c would be enough, but > > > both are fine with me, as my initial concern is gone. > > I agree. > > I will modify to "i2c-topcliff.c". > > > > > There's no Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Signed-off-by from anyone at Intel > > > in the patch you posted. > > Must we get Intel's signature ? > > We have already got the following. Isn't this enough ? > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > > > Though I haven't heard like the requirement, > > if Intel's signature is mandatory, I will request to Intel. > > It's not mandatory, but the time Ben and myself have to review new > drivers is scarce, so it's in your own interest to have the code > reviewed by people with more time and more interest in the specific > hardware. I can only imagine that Intel wants Topcliff to be supported > as soon as possible by the Linux kernel, so they should certainly have > resources to allocate for the review and testing. > > -- > Jean Delvare > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_I2C driver to 2.6.36 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:57:22 +0900 Message-ID: <008e01cb7569$8a01a2d0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> References: <4CC645A1.5010509@dsn.okisemi.com><20101026102048.316d0c04@endymion.delvare><001a01cb74ec$e3eb3ea0$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com><20101026111322.738b0b14@endymion.delvare><001c01cb74f2$d3dd8990$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> <20101026132649.623461f9@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare , Wang Qi , Wang Yong Y Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Wolfram Sang , Ralf Baechle , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML , Ben Dooks , Linus Walleij , srinidhi kasagar , Tomoya MORINAGA , kok.howg.ewe-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, joel.clark-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, andrew.chih.howe.khor-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:26 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > It's not mandatory, but the time Ben and myself have to review new > drivers is scarce, so it's in your own interest to have the code > reviewed by people with more time and more interest in the specific > hardware. I can only imagine that Intel wants Topcliff to be supported > as soon as possible by the Linux kernel, so they should certainly have > resources to allocate for the review and testing. I see. I will reuest Intel to review again and put signature. > Hi Qi and Yong Y Could you review this patch again and put signature? Thanks, Tomoya(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean Delvare" To: "Tomoya MORINAGA" Cc: "Samuel Ortiz" ; "Wolfram Sang" ; "Ralf Baechle" ; ; "LKML" ; "Ben Dooks " ; "Linus Walleij" ; "srinidhi kasagar" ; "Tomoya MORINAGA" ; "Wang Qi" ; "Wang Yong Y" ; ; ; Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:26 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Topcliff: Update PCH_I2C driver to 2.6.36 > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:47:37 +0900, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > > > On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:13 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > The _pch becomes redundant then, i2c-topcliff.c would be enough, but > > > both are fine with me, as my initial concern is gone. > > I agree. > > I will modify to "i2c-topcliff.c". > > > > > There's no Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Signed-off-by from anyone at Intel > > > in the patch you posted. > > Must we get Intel's signature ? > > We have already got the following. Isn't this enough ? > > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > > > Though I haven't heard like the requirement, > > if Intel's signature is mandatory, I will request to Intel. > > It's not mandatory, but the time Ben and myself have to review new > drivers is scarce, so it's in your own interest to have the code > reviewed by people with more time and more interest in the specific > hardware. I can only imagine that Intel wants Topcliff to be supported > as soon as possible by the Linux kernel, so they should certainly have > resources to allocate for the review and testing. > > -- > Jean Delvare > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >