From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sunad.s@samsung.com (Sunad Bhandary) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:34:00 +0530 Subject: [PATCHv3] NVMe: write_long SCSI to NVMe translation implementation In-Reply-To: References: <1427118493-29227-1-git-send-email-sunad.s@samsung.com> <006501d06629$b8397550$28ac5ff0$@samsung.com> Message-ID: <00aa01d0783d$712a4c40$537ee4c0$@samsung.com> Hi Keith, I see that this has not been committed yet. Are any changes needed to the patch from my side ? Thanks and regards, Sunad -----Original Message----- From: Linux-nvme [mailto:linux-nvme-bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Keith Busch Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 7:25 PM To: Sunad Bhandary Cc: keith.busch at intel.com; linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: [PATCHv3] NVMe: write_long SCSI to NVMe translation implementation Hi Sunad, On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Sunad Bhandary wrote: > Hi Keith, > > I think this patch suffices for the shortcomings of the previous versions. > Does anything else seem amiss ? > > If I am to submit a version of the patch for the legacy-nvme , the > SCSI macro SERVICE_ACTION _OUT_16 is not present in the kernel. > Is it alright to define a Macro SAO_16(0x9f) exclusive to nvme-scsi > to support WRITE_LONG_16? Sounds good. Patch v3 looks good to me as well. Thanks, Keith > From: Sunad Bhandary S > > This patch implements the SCSI to NVMe translation for write_long. > write_long is translated to the NVMe command write_uncorrectable as > defined by the translation specification version 1.4. > > This patch also indicates the device support for write_uncorrectable > method in the response of extended inquiry as defined in the translation spec. Acked-by: Keith Busch > Signed-off-by: Sunad Bhandary S _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme