All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: flash_lock issue for n25q 128mb spi nor part
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 12:35:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00cf6eab-9798-b0e9-e4a2-5b2f8374b698@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce595e1f-a703-e1f1-264b-6c7e66dcc1fa@microchip.com>

On 03/12/2019 12:27, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/3/19 2:05 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index f4afe123e9dc..f1490c7b5cb9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -1033,10 +1033,19 @@ static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1)
>>
>>          sr_cr[0] = sr1;
>>
>> +       dev_err(nor->dev, "before write: sr_cr[0] = %02x, sr_cr[1] = %02x\n",
>> +               sr_cr[0], sr_cr[1]);
>> +
>>          ret = spi_nor_write_sr(nor, sr_cr, 2);
>>          if (ret)
>>                  return ret;
>>
>> +       ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, &sr_cr[0]);
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       dev_err(nor->dev, "read back sr1: sr_cr[0] = %02x\n", sr_cr[0]);
>> +
>>          if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR)
>>                  return 0;
>>
>> @@ -1046,6 +1055,8 @@ static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr1)
>>          if (ret)
>>                  return ret;
>>
>> +       dev_err(nor->dev, "read back sr2: sr_cr[1] = %02x\n", sr_cr[1]);
>> +
>>          if (cr_written != sr_cr[1]) {
>>                  dev_dbg(nor->dev, "CR: read back test failed\
> 
> On n25q256a I obtain:
> 
> root@sama5d2-xplained-sd:~# flash_lock -l /dev/mtd1
> spi-nor spi1.0: before write: sr_cr[0] = 9e, sr_cr[1] = ff
> spi-nor spi1.0: read back sr1: sr_cr[0] = 02
> spi-nor spi1.0: read back sr2: sr_cr[1] = ff
> 

So here is what I get:

root@ubuntu:/home/john# flash_lock -l /dev/mtd0
[  109.037492] spi-nor spi-PRP0001:00: before write: sr_cr[0] = 9e, 
sr_cr[1] = 00
[  109.044769] spi-nor spi-PRP0001:00: read back sr1: sr_cr[0] = 02
[  109.050790] spi-nor spi-PRP0001:00: read back sr2: sr_cr[1] = 00


> the 16 bit write SR does not execute correctly and the WE remains set. If
> neither of the micron flashes do not support the 16 bit write SR, we can add a
> condition based on MFR. Let me check few datasheets.
> 

OK, thanks.

John


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-03 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-02 17:28 flash_lock issue for n25q 128mb spi nor part John Garry
2019-12-03  9:45 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 10:31   ` John Garry
2019-12-03 11:07     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 11:44       ` John Garry
2019-12-03 12:05         ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 12:27           ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 12:35             ` John Garry [this message]
2019-12-03 13:57               ` John Garry
2019-12-03 14:44                 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 15:29                   ` John Garry
2019-12-04 11:10                     ` John Garry
2019-12-16 18:09                       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-17  8:57                         ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-12-17 10:09                           ` John Garry
2020-01-09 10:36                           ` John Garry
2020-01-10 11:51                             ` Tudor.Ambarus
2020-01-10 11:56                               ` John Garry
2020-01-15  9:28                                 ` John Garry
2020-03-09 10:15                               ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: Clear WEL bit when erase or program errors occur Tudor.Ambarus
2020-03-09 10:15                                 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix description of the sr_ready() return value Tudor.Ambarus
2020-03-09 15:04                                 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: Clear WEL bit when erase or program errors occur John Garry
2020-03-23 17:58                                   ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:16               ` [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the write Status Register on micron flashes Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:16                 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:50                 ` [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Fix the writing of the " Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-03 14:50                   ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-12-04 10:18                   ` John Garry
2019-12-04 10:18                     ` John Garry
2020-01-09 19:14                   ` Miquel Raynal
2020-01-09 19:14                     ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=00cf6eab-9798-b0e9-e4a2-5b2f8374b698@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.