From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB4AC433E9 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0D461A4A for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230095AbhCZGYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:24:06 -0400 Received: from [212.63.208.185] ([212.63.208.185]:44310 "EHLO mail.marcansoft.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229782AbhCZGXs (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:23:48 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 58547 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 02:23:46 EDT Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcan@marcan.st) by mail.marcansoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA5CA425DF; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 13/27] arm64: Add Apple vendor-specific system registers To: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mark Kettenis , Tony Lindgren , Mohamed Mediouni , Stan Skowronek , Alexander Graf , Linus Walleij , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210304213902.83903-1-marcan@marcan.st> <20210304213902.83903-14-marcan@marcan.st> <20210324183818.GF13181@willie-the-truck> <20210324185921.GA27297@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20210324190428.GG13181@willie-the-truck> From: Hector Martin Message-ID: <00d7b1ea-b455-c443-d350-d71a432573e5@marcan.st> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:23:30 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210324190428.GG13181@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: es-ES Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/03/2021 04.04, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:59:21PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >> So far we've kept arch/arm64/ largely devoid of IMP-DEF bits, and it >> seems a shame to add something with the sole purpose of collating that, >> especially given arch code shouldn't need to touch these if FW and >> bootloader have done their jobs right. >> >> Can we put the definitions in the relevant drivers? That would sidestep >> any pain with MAINTAINERS, too. > > If we can genuinely ignore these in arch code, then sure. I just don't know > how long that is going to be the case, and ending up in a situation where > these are scattered randomly throughout the tree sounds horrible to me. I thought we would need some in KVM code, but given the direction Marc's series ended up in, it seems we won't. So I'm happy keeping these in the respective drivers; if this ends up being messy in the future it shouldn't be a big deal to refactor it all into one file again. -- Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st) Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48D4C433E1 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CCDE61A42 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:25:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4CCDE61A42 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=marcan.st Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=mfOSKmdBxFpFrUZtPtfYdz2wXbLFBPPI7i7IBCtk9qk=; b=O9P1TpkDhLJNBq5aD4o8pbHAd atdTXujMy+UKnBgoE1ek8yzBRdFzjtjVN/2GMJih+sKOk4czbNcMdKf7QmzxwT20waEqsUcCROrZW dGZfCzYyVlmXXtLhmq9jfOVDvoXGyWrJ9bLDW+QTRfwKg7SrRXdeBlDomJLeQK492ChDP0YVYkahX ksjQsjpU7s5y7g3pLvHPfEnQkp1RGXuUn08bS1cKz40C92Uki+zHuAtXHMNlLj6BtCnv2Iz0R7Xiu JKULbhbjNizVIry5qoCyupoJlDieKYLPV5VakUN5cT6DV5HtJpKKv/FH/zqJ1wPAUDSeShBJuIJm4 qpawfwoMg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lPfsw-002r4t-Ak; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:23:54 +0000 Received: from [212.63.208.185] (helo=mail.marcansoft.com) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lPfsn-002r3t-A0 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:23:48 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcan@marcan.st) by mail.marcansoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA5CA425DF; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 06:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 13/27] arm64: Add Apple vendor-specific system registers To: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mark Kettenis , Tony Lindgren , Mohamed Mediouni , Stan Skowronek , Alexander Graf , Linus Walleij , Andy Shevchenko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210304213902.83903-1-marcan@marcan.st> <20210304213902.83903-14-marcan@marcan.st> <20210324183818.GF13181@willie-the-truck> <20210324185921.GA27297@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <20210324190428.GG13181@willie-the-truck> From: Hector Martin Message-ID: <00d7b1ea-b455-c443-d350-d71a432573e5@marcan.st> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:23:30 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210324190428.GG13181@willie-the-truck> Content-Language: es-ES X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210326_062345_605835_60073EC8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.24 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 25/03/2021 04.04, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:59:21PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >> So far we've kept arch/arm64/ largely devoid of IMP-DEF bits, and it >> seems a shame to add something with the sole purpose of collating that, >> especially given arch code shouldn't need to touch these if FW and >> bootloader have done their jobs right. >> >> Can we put the definitions in the relevant drivers? That would sidestep >> any pain with MAINTAINERS, too. > > If we can genuinely ignore these in arch code, then sure. I just don't know > how long that is going to be the case, and ending up in a situation where > these are scattered randomly throughout the tree sounds horrible to me. I thought we would need some in KVM code, but given the direction Marc's series ended up in, it seems we won't. So I'm happy keeping these in the respective drivers; if this ends up being messy in the future it shouldn't be a big deal to refactor it all into one file again. -- Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st) Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel