From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751323AbbESV2j (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 17:28:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kmu-office.ch ([178.209.48.109]:39482 "EHLO mail.kmu-office.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbbESV2h (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2015 17:28:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:26:53 +0200 From: Stefan Agner To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, Russell King - ARM Linux , jason@lakedaemon.net, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, marc.zyngier@arm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, galak@codeaurora.org, Thomas Gleixner , shawn.guo@linaro.org, Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/13] ARM: unify MMU/!MMU addruart calls In-Reply-To: <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> References: <1431769465-26867-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> <2419398.cbLWQC7K5f@wuerfel> <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> Message-ID: <0103afd0e9dd50c1bf85153a38a3490f@agner.ch> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2015-05-19 20:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 18:06:53 Stefan Agner wrote: >> On 2015-05-19 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > Do you have a dependency on patch 10 (the one for EFM32) in your later >> > patches? >> >> Unfortunately, there is a dependency on that patch: I change the default >> of UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE to debug/uncompress.h for all ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M >> platforms. Without that patch, it would default to mach/uncompress.h, >> which does not exist for MACH_MXC/SOC_VF610. > > An easy approach would be to list both ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and > EFM32 in the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE option initially, and then > follow-up with a patch that converts the three other platforms > (efm32, stm32 and lpc18xx) to ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and also > change the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE statement. > > Note that I've already added both stm32 and lpc18xx to the > UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE list in the next/soc branch. Afaiks, only ARCH_LPC18XX is in UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE, probably STM32 doesn't support compressed image/earlyprintk? >> > If not, you can send the other ones to Shawn, so I pull them as >> > a branch, and then I apply that on top of the merges. I have also >> > merged two other ARMv7M platforms for 4.2 now (both in next/soc), >> > so we should do the same change for those as well, and I'd rather >> > apply a patch for that, than merge a branch that is based on >> > next/soc. >> >> I guess, in that case, you need to take the others too? (08/09?) > > I'm fine with that, too. If Shawn thinks the patches are ok, you can > just send all patches you want me to apply in arm-soc based on > the appropriate branches (next/soc, next/dt and next/defconfig, I > presume), and I'll apply them this time. In the future, you should > send all patches to Shawn though. Ok, I will rebase this patchset (06-13) then, send the clocksource patch (07) as a single patch and send the EFM32 convertion patch (10) together with a conversion patch of the other two platforms as a follow-up. -- Stefan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Agner Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/13] ARM: unify MMU/!MMU addruart calls Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:26:53 +0200 Message-ID: <0103afd0e9dd50c1bf85153a38a3490f@agner.ch> References: <1431769465-26867-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> <2419398.cbLWQC7K5f@wuerfel> <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mcoquelin.stm32-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org, olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, Thomas Gleixner , shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Shawn Guo List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2015-05-19 20:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 18:06:53 Stefan Agner wrote: >> On 2015-05-19 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > Do you have a dependency on patch 10 (the one for EFM32) in your later >> > patches? >> >> Unfortunately, there is a dependency on that patch: I change the default >> of UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE to debug/uncompress.h for all ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M >> platforms. Without that patch, it would default to mach/uncompress.h, >> which does not exist for MACH_MXC/SOC_VF610. > > An easy approach would be to list both ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and > EFM32 in the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE option initially, and then > follow-up with a patch that converts the three other platforms > (efm32, stm32 and lpc18xx) to ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and also > change the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE statement. > > Note that I've already added both stm32 and lpc18xx to the > UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE list in the next/soc branch. Afaiks, only ARCH_LPC18XX is in UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE, probably STM32 doesn't support compressed image/earlyprintk? >> > If not, you can send the other ones to Shawn, so I pull them as >> > a branch, and then I apply that on top of the merges. I have also >> > merged two other ARMv7M platforms for 4.2 now (both in next/soc), >> > so we should do the same change for those as well, and I'd rather >> > apply a patch for that, than merge a branch that is based on >> > next/soc. >> >> I guess, in that case, you need to take the others too? (08/09?) > > I'm fine with that, too. If Shawn thinks the patches are ok, you can > just send all patches you want me to apply in arm-soc based on > the appropriate branches (next/soc, next/dt and next/defconfig, I > presume), and I'll apply them this time. In the future, you should > send all patches to Shawn though. Ok, I will rebase this patchset (06-13) then, send the clocksource patch (07) as a single patch and send the EFM32 convertion patch (10) together with a conversion patch of the other two platforms as a follow-up. -- Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stefan@agner.ch (Stefan Agner) Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:26:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v7 08/13] ARM: unify MMU/!MMU addruart calls In-Reply-To: <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> References: <1431769465-26867-1-git-send-email-stefan@agner.ch> <2419398.cbLWQC7K5f@wuerfel> <5548280.7uBnLuun8k@wuerfel> Message-ID: <0103afd0e9dd50c1bf85153a38a3490f@agner.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2015-05-19 20:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 18:06:53 Stefan Agner wrote: >> On 2015-05-19 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > Do you have a dependency on patch 10 (the one for EFM32) in your later >> > patches? >> >> Unfortunately, there is a dependency on that patch: I change the default >> of UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE to debug/uncompress.h for all ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M >> platforms. Without that patch, it would default to mach/uncompress.h, >> which does not exist for MACH_MXC/SOC_VF610. > > An easy approach would be to list both ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and > EFM32 in the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE option initially, and then > follow-up with a patch that converts the three other platforms > (efm32, stm32 and lpc18xx) to ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M and also > change the UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE statement. > > Note that I've already added both stm32 and lpc18xx to the > UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE list in the next/soc branch. Afaiks, only ARCH_LPC18XX is in UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE, probably STM32 doesn't support compressed image/earlyprintk? >> > If not, you can send the other ones to Shawn, so I pull them as >> > a branch, and then I apply that on top of the merges. I have also >> > merged two other ARMv7M platforms for 4.2 now (both in next/soc), >> > so we should do the same change for those as well, and I'd rather >> > apply a patch for that, than merge a branch that is based on >> > next/soc. >> >> I guess, in that case, you need to take the others too? (08/09?) > > I'm fine with that, too. If Shawn thinks the patches are ok, you can > just send all patches you want me to apply in arm-soc based on > the appropriate branches (next/soc, next/dt and next/defconfig, I > presume), and I'll apply them this time. In the future, you should > send all patches to Shawn though. Ok, I will rebase this patchset (06-13) then, send the clocksource patch (07) as a single patch and send the EFM32 convertion patch (10) together with a conversion patch of the other two platforms as a follow-up. -- Stefan