From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37840)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from
) id 1Zouml-0002I6-QU
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:54:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1Zoumg-0006aX-0n
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:54:39 -0400
Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:54015)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1Zoumf-0006aF-RO
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:54:33 -0400
Received: from eucpsbgm1.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.244])
by mailout4.w1.samsung.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5
2014)) with ESMTP id <0NWK00J4OS2V9V70@mailout4.w1.samsung.com> for
qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 15:54:31 +0100 (BST)
From: Pavel Fedin
References: <1445361732-16257-1-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com>
<1445361732-16257-7-git-send-email-shlomopongratz@gmail.com>
<014301d10bfe$20c00970$62401c50$@samsung.com>
<015801d10c02$1c60d130$55227390$@samsung.com>
<016c01d10c07$3b156fa0$b1404ee0$@samsung.com>
<019c01d10c0c$83292e30$897b8a90$@samsung.com>
<01ba01d10c0e$9ebbfa90$dc33efb0$@samsung.com>
In-reply-to:
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:54:29 +0300
Message-id: <01c701d10c10$642bb0d0$2c831270$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Content-language: ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V5 6/9] hw/intc: arm_gicv3_spi_its
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
To: 'Peter Maydell'
Cc: 'Eric Auger' , 'Shlomo Pongratz' , 'Shlomo Pongratz' , 'QEMU Developers' , 'Shannon Zhao' , 'Ashok Kumar' , 'Igor Mammedov'
Hello!
> For QEMU we could in theory do either; I was leaning towards
> direct connection just because on the KVM side the in-kernel
> GIC isn't going to separate them out as two distinct things.
I'd say this is not entirely true. With KVM you still can have vGIC =
without vITS. Just don't set KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_ITS and that's it. =
The only thing linked in is LPI support. With KVM you cannot have LPIs =
without vITS. Neither you can directly inject LPIs.
So, in-kernel ITS is also optional.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia