All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dave Jones" <davej@redhat.com>
To: <Administrator@smtp.paston.co.uk>
Cc: "Mikael Pettersson" <mikpe@csd.uu.se>, <szepe@pinerecords.com>,
	<akpm@osdl.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <020e01c415a4$8277ddd0$d100000a@sbs2003.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073233988.5225.9.camel@fur>

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:33:08AM -0500, Rob Love wrote:

 > Yah.  I was just answering in the abstract to the "does cache line
 > matter on non-SMP" question.
 > 
 > I actually like this patch (perhaps since I have a P-M :) and think it
 > ought to go in, although I agree with others that the P-M is more of a
 > super-P3 than a scaled down P4.

FWIW, I agree with it too on the grounds that its non obvious the optimal
setting is CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII. This seems cleaner IMO than changing the
helptext to read...

 "Pentium II"
 "Pentium III / Pentium 4M"
 "Pentium 4"

My other mail may have sounded like I objected to the patch per se, I don't.

		Dave

-- 
 Dave Jones     http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-29 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-04 12:27 Pentium M config option for 2.6 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-04 12:33 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-06  6:07   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-03-29 15:46   ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-01-04 15:03 ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 16:25   ` Dave Jones
2004-01-04 16:33     ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 16:50       ` Dave Jones
2004-01-04 17:01         ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 17:14           ` Tomas Szepe
2004-03-29 15:42           ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-04 17:03         ` Troels Walsted Hansen
2004-01-04 17:35           ` Dave Jones
2004-01-04 21:51         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-03-29 15:42         ` Rob Love
2004-01-04 20:34       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-04 21:55         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-01-04 23:37           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-03-29 15:42       ` Dave Jones [this message]
2004-03-29 15:42     ` Rob Love
2004-03-29 15:42   ` Dave Jones
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Rob Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-29 15:42 Mikael Pettersson
2004-03-29 15:42 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-05 15:09 Amit Gurdasani
2004-01-05 15:22 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-01-04 14:10 Mikael Pettersson
2004-01-04 14:43 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-04 15:59   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-03-29 15:42   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-03-29 15:42 ` Tomas Szepe
2004-01-04  2:28 Tomas Szepe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='020e01c415a4$8277ddd0$d100000a@sbs2003.local' \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=Administrator@smtp.paston.co.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    --cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.