From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70DAC4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF73610CE for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235325AbhHSBmv (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:42:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36108 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234194AbhHSBmu (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 21:42:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F26A9C061764 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id e7so4313460pgk.2 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vE2NquF8aYczXeoe6PGRGJC5TmHhDUeKxtlQ0G2jkj0=; b=TzkGaYSavbzKcla9b22EsIZ0UYcGwBCBQIe7qkkxrWrB9VDShq4qDo/WgRh2Ompz2v V1wAoaQfblkOpY5Tw0JpwU4pcsI9xRF8BvwvDxeEjv8WmlHw8IiYhCaCURe6N/IZVhsY Ad7YMItNSYzdTQwTXOIeo8ZOpP4MY0RDR1YQRUVIubHozViqgo8PifeL4s2Dmh42dwN4 Y1REyb8/lkPkdqPUSo2o9YrtXfhGI4pM9rfANGyFthSOEC8GgJwwj4u6vEKSWNL8PPqV E0Bg7NHdpxsxFaxEjUPfmaposl06OVyYGBHh8PBmm9+TFXmyqlLBYVvAXJn5LbTcbTGy qv+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vE2NquF8aYczXeoe6PGRGJC5TmHhDUeKxtlQ0G2jkj0=; b=nvaLmxNyTFrocvalUxZyjBNB8fr7kWrPfcChmgJ2zDlPnmz9ZjslxLat76pGrhrwZH I0Rupq1/j34KOBMEKxUrXE5VtHQb+Pt0Q9hZNvA4ofMggBUerT5E5BIUBviX53CbTvkh S3uCCdJ6wo6N3wdawrEpzxW119s42Ew9z2YvwoySgViDOM7LeOBtiisQVAqYhnbTzRFf BK/BKtm6ZrRxO1tk0KCvue+4/xvIf0XAuwiEyDidtFCgftK2erWfDND1B17+VD0OWu22 lT4vAB0lVlQXazNZSHj4aVYWrOx0oV2bIhrJEHw6I9nkcO8gfThq6U0Jg6thhbUFUBo7 gWWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qHznNHEF0Nk8IBO5nkvTPRfaReSCuiEIE0QTlyHQc8Shm8bef TYu74sReYDlAqg5PyFkijw8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwc/9Y6Qg1flKQWhWZ4XJflaQczD3jDWqCEJHeKG8vExwOCWSrEETTQioJ+3wL3HUrYCxLX0A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1155:: with SMTP id 21mr11652333pgr.346.1629337334181; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-6-216-183.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.216.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18sm1046591pfg.111.2021.08.18.18.42.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/6] Initial x86_64 UEFI support From: Nadav Amit In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:11 -0700 Cc: Varad Gautam , Joerg Roedel , kvm list , Linux Virtualization , Paolo Bonzini , Andrew Jones , bp@suse.de, "Lendacky, Thomas" , "Singh, Brijesh" , Zixuan Wang , "Hyunwook (Wooky) Baek" , Erdem Aktas , Tom Roeder Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0250F07B-AC9A-4110-B2F4-8537A40D8848@gmail.com> References: <20210702114820.16712-1-varad.gautam@suse.com> <71db10eb-997f-aac1-5d41-3bcbc34c114d@suse.com> To: Marc Orr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org > On Aug 18, 2021, at 6:32 PM, Marc Orr wrote: > > This sounds great to us. We will also experiment with combining the > two patchsets and report back when we have some experience with this. > Though, please do also report back if you have an update on this > before we do. Just wondering (aka, my standard question): does it work on bare-metal (putting aside tests that rely on test-devices)? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB47C4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C61C610A1 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7C61C610A1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3638F607EC; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5lJGE8mgG9Ii; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E5CA60BB9; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B291C001A; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5E9C000E for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FEF40275 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5FV20uE_rpBy for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BFAA402D9 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id y23so4313141pgi.7 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vE2NquF8aYczXeoe6PGRGJC5TmHhDUeKxtlQ0G2jkj0=; b=TzkGaYSavbzKcla9b22EsIZ0UYcGwBCBQIe7qkkxrWrB9VDShq4qDo/WgRh2Ompz2v V1wAoaQfblkOpY5Tw0JpwU4pcsI9xRF8BvwvDxeEjv8WmlHw8IiYhCaCURe6N/IZVhsY Ad7YMItNSYzdTQwTXOIeo8ZOpP4MY0RDR1YQRUVIubHozViqgo8PifeL4s2Dmh42dwN4 Y1REyb8/lkPkdqPUSo2o9YrtXfhGI4pM9rfANGyFthSOEC8GgJwwj4u6vEKSWNL8PPqV E0Bg7NHdpxsxFaxEjUPfmaposl06OVyYGBHh8PBmm9+TFXmyqlLBYVvAXJn5LbTcbTGy qv+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=vE2NquF8aYczXeoe6PGRGJC5TmHhDUeKxtlQ0G2jkj0=; b=F954HPEt2A/Oo+vTqdE1I9IR9zRlmkUIkXdv6xjjnTUyupVEaBMEeI19sLaryAi85g l9JP9iYNzR16vNO2Cb4r3vhkKI6VPFJ3BRJgVYFKnxbB2mcth88btNaS5DSCuy3W9cqW D8EBLPugzw3834b4E811n1ca3dDII8Xd/77Dgp38kDvjWzFQFh4Hz29YseHLYxBy4ge1 OTEfMIwgoitHZMzuj0RTq6O9GbO7NdVInvvOFtFsdm01Wxi4ru3MIK8f9k4/MKe4Nzhb nSk+GP8+U6qmz+3HwRnrzeBtQsGA9JEkO02gfaYRchgu7rg3T2fIChoxp6GRnTtsChWO YUpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NpoCF5Ai1wrDxlE/RwEEwHJDDlvpRWthC1dxoCgR4mqUWGqac gWanPEty6kWiHVLLEtO77AU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwc/9Y6Qg1flKQWhWZ4XJflaQczD3jDWqCEJHeKG8vExwOCWSrEETTQioJ+3wL3HUrYCxLX0A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1155:: with SMTP id 21mr11652333pgr.346.1629337334181; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-6-216-183.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.216.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t18sm1046591pfg.111.2021.08.18.18.42.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/6] Initial x86_64 UEFI support From: Nadav Amit In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 18:42:11 -0700 Message-Id: <0250F07B-AC9A-4110-B2F4-8537A40D8848@gmail.com> References: <20210702114820.16712-1-varad.gautam@suse.com> <71db10eb-997f-aac1-5d41-3bcbc34c114d@suse.com> To: Marc Orr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) Cc: "Lendacky, Thomas" , Andrew Jones , Joerg Roedel , "Singh, Brijesh" , kvm list , Tom Roeder , "Hyunwook \(Wooky\) Baek" , Linux Virtualization , Zixuan Wang , Erdem Aktas , Paolo Bonzini , bp@suse.de X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" > On Aug 18, 2021, at 6:32 PM, Marc Orr wrote: > > This sounds great to us. We will also experiment with combining the > two patchsets and report back when we have some experience with this. > Though, please do also report back if you have an update on this > before we do. Just wondering (aka, my standard question): does it work on bare-metal (putting aside tests that rely on test-devices)? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization