All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] smp: convert cpu_hotplug_begin into a blocking lock acquisition
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:58:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <028f4317-7555-218a-c833-b36300a11b8f@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <960b4da8-4522-082a-42b9-ab870698a5ec@suse.com>

On 19/02/2020 13:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.02.2020 14:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:59:51PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.02.2020 12:32, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>>> Don't allow cpu_hotplug_begin to fail by converting the trylock into a
>>>> blocking lock acquisition. Write users of the cpu_add_remove_lock are
>>>> limited to CPU plug/unplug operations, and cannot deadlock between
>>>> themselves or other users taking the lock in read mode as
>>>> cpu_add_remove_lock is always locked with interrupts enabled. There
>>>> are also no other locks taken during the plug/unplug operations.
>>> I don't think the goal was deadlock avoidance, but rather limiting
>>> of the time spent spinning while trying to acquire the lock, in
>>> favor of having the caller retry.
>> Now that the contention between read-only users is reduced as those
>> can take the lock in parallel I think it's safe to switch writers to
>> blocking mode.
> I'd agree if writers couldn't be starved by (many) readers.

XSA-114.

We fixed that vulnerability ages ago.

A writer wanting the lock will prevent further readers from taking it
before the writer drops it.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-19 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-13 11:32 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] smp: convert cpu_add_remove_lock int a rw lock Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-13 11:32 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] smp: convert the cpu maps lock into " Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-19 12:08   ` Julien Grall
2020-02-19 12:56   ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 13:19     ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-19 13:42       ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 14:38         ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-20  8:13   ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-20  8:27     ` Jürgen Groß
2020-02-20  8:36       ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-20  8:57         ` Julien Grall
2020-02-20  9:20           ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-13 11:32 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] smp: convert cpu_hotplug_begin into a blocking lock acquisition Roger Pau Monne
2020-02-19 12:59   ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 13:22     ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-19 13:44       ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 14:45         ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-19 14:57           ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 15:07             ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-19 16:06               ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 16:26                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-19 17:06                   ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 16:54                 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-02-19 16:08               ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-19 17:03                 ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-20  8:16                   ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-21 10:23                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2020-02-21 13:06                       ` Jan Beulich
2020-02-19 14:58         ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2020-02-19 12:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] smp: convert cpu_add_remove_lock int a rw lock Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=028f4317-7555-218a-c833-b36300a11b8f@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.