From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B603AC4741F for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA1D207DE for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=shipmail.org header.i=@shipmail.org header.b="G9lme/AP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2CA1D207DE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=shipmail.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5506ED1A; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ste-pvt-msa2.bahnhof.se (ste-pvt-msa2.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.71]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850E56ED1A for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ste-pvt-msa2.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F09D3F583; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:25:52 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: ste-pvt-msa2.bahnhof.se; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=shipmail.org header.i=@shipmail.org header.b=G9lme/AP; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bahnhof.se Authentication-Results: ste-ftg-msa2.bahnhof.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=shipmail.org Received: from ste-pvt-msa2.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ste-ftg-msa2.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOYGxWKNv--D; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:25:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by ste-pvt-msa2.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 914563F3BF; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:25:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from Win10-45-1tb161.SSPE.ch.intel.com (jfdmzpr06-ext.jf.intel.com [134.134.137.75]) by mail1.shipmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 367D83605DC; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:26:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=shipmail.org; s=mail; t=1604049967; bh=X7rL1/k4PD8pDOVQQMA5nBNYJgGAEO0/xxbaaXtqqzo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=G9lme/AP9mGNElTFFsgPleUOw7PwFsxtRqEzhLzmbUlyVspFWqTi7uy5NBKaISXHs 3P9xdM+PJegkxUJJrUtVwha5FvZ39ex1usgSdtSSh/H3uUKqrV0Ct3GWj4KMhEeKLS K1oc/+BUmzP42DI8L2KGYDzgdq2OifBtGqVz6ljU= To: Maarten Lankhorst , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20201016104444.1492028-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> <20201016104444.1492028-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m_=28Intel=29?= Message-ID: <02b0d2c2-5687-03b1-7741-34a3c2c819ac@shipmail.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:26:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201016104444.1492028-15-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 14/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED for userptr X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 10/16/20 12:43 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > We should not allow this any more, as it will break with the new userptr > implementation, it could still be made to work, but there's no point in > doing so. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst Ifdefs don't appear consistent with the commit message. Wrong patch or separate patch? Also please add a discussion what impact this has on existing user-space. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx