From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Create and use a TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING macro Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:05:58 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <02bf2f54b8dcb76a62a142b6dfe07d4ef7fc582e.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net> In-Reply-To: <cover.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net> x86_32, unlike x86_64, pads the top of the kernel stack. Document this padding and give it a name. This should make no change whatsoever to the compiled kernel image. It also doesn't fix any of the current bugs in this area. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 ++- arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 48a61c1c626e..88d9aa745898 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -849,7 +849,8 @@ extern unsigned long thread_saved_pc(struct task_struct *tsk); #define task_pt_regs(task) \ ({ \ struct pt_regs *__regs__; \ - __regs__ = (struct pt_regs *)(KSTK_TOP(task_stack_page(task))-8); \ + __regs__ = (struct pt_regs *)(KSTK_TOP(task_stack_page(task)) - \ + TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING); \ __regs__ - 1; \ }) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h index 7740edd56fed..74fd74ca50d3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h @@ -49,6 +49,36 @@ struct thread_info { #define init_thread_info (init_thread_union.thread_info) #define init_stack (init_thread_union.stack) +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 + +/* + * TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING is a number of unused bytes that we + * reserve at the top of the kernel stack. We do it because of a nasty + * 32-bit corner case. On x86_32, the hardware stack frame is + * variable-length. Except for vm86 mode, struct pt_regs assumes a + * maximum-length frame. If we enter from CPL 0, the top 8 bytes of + * pt_regs don't actually exist. Ordinarily this doesn't matter, but it + * does in at least one case: + * + * If we take an NMI early enough in sysenter, the we can end up with + * pt_regs that extends above sp0. On the way out, in the espfix code, + * we can read the saved SS value, but that value will be above sp0. + * Without this offset, that can result in a page fault. (We are + * careful that, in this case, the value we read doesn't matter.) + * + * In vm86 mode, the hardware frame is much longer still, but we neither + * access the extra members from NMI context, nor do we write such a + * frame at sp0 at all. + */ +#define TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING 8 + +#else + +/* Phew, x86_64 has a fixed-length stack frame! */ +#define TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING 0 + +#endif + #else /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ #include <asm/asm-offsets.h> -- 2.3.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-10 18:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-03-10 18:05 [PATCH 0/3] sp0, ss1, and sp1 docs and minor fixes Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-10 18:05 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message] 2015-03-10 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: Create and use a TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING macro Denys Vlasenko 2015-03-10 19:47 ` Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-13 14:08 ` Denys Vlasenko 2015-03-16 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar 2015-03-16 12:08 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Create and use a ' TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING' macro tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-17 8:45 ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-10 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: Unify and fix init sp0 Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-11 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov 2015-03-16 12:09 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Unify and fix initial thread_struct: :sp0 values tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-17 8:45 ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-10 18:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86_32: Document our abuse of ss1 and sp1 Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-10 19:13 ` Denys Vlasenko 2015-03-10 20:06 ` Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-10 20:52 ` Denys Vlasenko 2015-03-16 12:09 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/32: Document our abuse of x86_hw_tss: :ss1 and x86_hw_tss::sp1 tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-16 15:36 ` Andy Lutomirski 2015-03-17 8:45 ` tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=02bf2f54b8dcb76a62a142b6dfe07d4ef7fc582e.1426009661.git.luto@amacapital.net \ --to=luto@amacapital.net \ --cc=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Create and use a TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING macro' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.