From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Nelson Subject: Re: Testing with Bluestore and Filestore Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:02:25 -0600 Message-ID: <02cc6e71-c469-9e3b-8883-afe2bd7aecb9@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41276 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262AbdCBU1T (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:27:19 -0500 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720663D94F for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: dillaman@redhat.com, Gregory Farnum Cc: Brett Niver , John Spray , Sage Weil , ceph-devel On 03/02/2017 12:40 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Brett Niver wrote: >>> Sage, >>> >>> Perhaps this has already been discussed, but Jason had a good idea, >>> that perhaps instead of testing both BS and FS upstream independently, >>> and doubling our testing, we might have teuthology randomly pick >>> which to use. >>> >>> That would potentially reduce TCs and also give us the testing that >>> would help prepare for working thru the migration/transition once BS >>> is ready. >> >> This is really what the subset functionality is for, although I think >> John had started working on a feature in this area that would let the >> subset functionality go across the rados configuration options while >> guaranteeing full combinatorial explosion on the FS tests. >> -Greg > > I was actually thinking that OSDs should be randomly assigned an > object store by teuthology (i.e. roughly 50% FileStore vs 50% > BlueStore in the same cluster in the same test run). Right now, the > tests (at least for RBD) running 100% FileStore or 100% BlueStore with > no intermixing (and no verification that PGs comprised of FileStore > and BlueStore OSDs behave properly). That would also have the added > benefit of eliminating half the test cases in the RBD suite even > before you apply a subset. Seems reasonable to me. If the clusters are small we'll get pure bluestore and pure filestore every once and a while too which would be good. Mark > >>> >>> Brett >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >