From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpYOc-0002Kg-4C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:16:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpYOX-0001al-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:16:53 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57222) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpYOW-0001ab-SK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:16:49 -0400 References: <1475108205-6043-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= Message-ID: <02de8b86-6c44-5c5a-0498-fe60fb95b48c@suse.de> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:16:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1475108205-6043-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 29.09.2016 um 02:16 schrieb David Gibson: > is there really any value to supporting the "class" > properties in addition to the "instance" properties? Yes, it makes enumerating available properties easier by not requiring to instantiate a new instance for printing, e.g., ",help" information. Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg)