From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnNy3-0008F9-9R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:53:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fnNy2-0005zP-Ev for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:53:35 -0400 References: <20180618164504.24488-1-kwolf@redhat.com> <20180618164504.24488-22-kwolf@redhat.com> <28f44beb-e19b-3e26-254a-4678eacf30c2@redhat.com> <9d74eea6-3101-3325-e561-d55f112fe68c@virtuozzo.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <030bc8d6-a085-c376-51d2-6362cc55e5b0@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 07:53:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9d74eea6-3101-3325-e561-d55f112fe68c@virtuozzo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 21/35] block: fix QEMU crash with scsi-hd and drive_del List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz On 08/08/2018 06:40 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> I don't know how much the proposed NBD reconnect code will change=20 >> things in 3.1.=C2=A0 Meanwhile, we've missed any chance for 3.0 to fix= test=20 >> 83. >=20 > hmm, isn't 3.0 release planned on August 14th? Yes, but -rc4 has already been cut, and there will not be an -rc5 unless=20 there is a MAJOR regression identified in qemu proper (a failing iotest=20 is not major). --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org