From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpKbq-0007Am-Sz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:14:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpKbq-00035H-58 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:14:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpKbp-00034o-Ts for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 17:14:58 -0500 References: <1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1548410831-19553-42-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1bd28f71-6c37-2739-f181-4d8796fedb2c@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <037c6301-8c15-2bd9-3b34-4bb948661138@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 23:14:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1bd28f71-6c37-2739-f181-4d8796fedb2c@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 41/52] isa: express dependencies with kconfig List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: yang.zhong@intel.com, thuth@redhat.com On 31/01/19 22:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > I kinda disagree with the SuperIO generated configs here, but partly my > fault because the previous Makefile.objs missed the CONFIG_ISA_SUPERIO > (I missed to review eae2e2e96bf from Thomas where is introduced > CONFIG_SMC37C669). > So introducing ISA_SUPERIO simplifies this files and SouthBridge > devices. I'm not sure how to provide this patch: The problem is different SuperIO chips can have or lack floppy/serial/parallel, and so they end up having different dependencies. Config symbols are a tool to generate working QEMUs (where working =3D build and pass device-introspect-test more or less), they needn't reflect precisely the topology of the machine. Paolo