All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
	Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 19:39:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03a64b8b-9d13-5480-8882-75ecac3d6042@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180417142440.GB18509@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>

On 04/17/2018 04:25 PM, Leo Yan wrote:

>> @@ -5394,8 +5416,10 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>>   		update_cfs_group(se);
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (!se)
>> +	if (!se) {
>>   		add_nr_running(rq, 1);
>> +		update_overutilized_status(rq);
>> +	}
> 
> Maybe this isn't a good question, why only update overutilized flag
> for enqueue flow but not for dequeue flow?

[...]

>> @@ -9955,6 +10009,8 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
>>   
>>   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_numa_balancing))
>>   		task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
>> +
>> +	update_overutilized_status(rq);
> 
> Can sched tick clear overutilized flag if under tipping point?

No, only the load balancer for this particular sched domain level is 
able to clear the flag. We want to use the existing iteration over all 
cpus of the sched domain span to reset the flag.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-17 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-06 15:36 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Energy Aware Scheduling Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] sched/fair: Create util_fits_capacity() Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-12  7:02   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-12  8:20     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] sched: Introduce energy models of CPUs Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-10 11:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-10 12:03     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-13  4:02   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-13  8:37     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] sched: Add over-utilization/tipping point indicator Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-13 23:56   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-18 11:17     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-20  8:13       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-20  8:14         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-04-20  8:31           ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-20  8:57             ` Juri Lelli
2018-04-17 14:25   ` Leo Yan
2018-04-17 17:39     ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2018-04-18  0:18       ` Leo Yan
2018-04-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] sched/fair: Introduce an energy estimation helper function Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-10 12:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-10 13:56     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-10 14:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-13  6:27   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-17 15:22   ` Leo Yan
2018-04-18  8:13     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-18  9:19       ` Leo Yan
2018-04-18 11:06         ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-18  9:23   ` Leo Yan
2018-04-20 14:51     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-18 12:15   ` Leo Yan
2018-04-20 14:42     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-20 16:27       ` Leo Yan
2018-04-25  8:23         ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] sched/fair: Select an energy-efficient CPU on task wake-up Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-09 16:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-09 16:43     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-10 17:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-10 18:14     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-17 15:39   ` Leo Yan
2018-04-18  7:57     ` Quentin Perret
2018-04-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] drivers: base: arch_topology.c: Enable EAS for arm/arm64 platforms Dietmar Eggemann
2018-04-17 12:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Energy Aware Scheduling Leo Yan
2018-04-17 17:22   ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03a64b8b-9d13-5480-8882-75ecac3d6042@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=smuckle@google.com \
    --cc=thara.gopinath@linaro.org \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.