From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDDFC282CE for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 15:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81255217F9 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 15:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729669AbfEVPAK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 11:00:10 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:49953 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727975AbfEVPAK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 11:00:10 -0400 Received: from fsav103.sakura.ne.jp (fsav103.sakura.ne.jp [27.133.134.230]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x4MEwU3L044008; Wed, 22 May 2019 23:58:30 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav103.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav103.sakura.ne.jp); Wed, 22 May 2019 23:58:30 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav103.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (softbank126012062002.bbtec.net [126.12.62.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x4MEwEkC043762 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 May 2019 23:58:30 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/hung_task.c: Monitor killed tasks. To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Petr Mladek , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Liu Chuansheng , Valdis Kletnieks , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov References: <1557745331-10367-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20190515105540.vyzh6n62rqi5imqv@pathway.suse.cz> <20190516115758.6v7oitg3vbkfhh5j@pathway.suse.cz> <20190522234134.44327256@canb.auug.org.au> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: <03b5834d-5f8f-9c7e-20df-cfdf5395d245@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 23:58:12 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522234134.44327256@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/05/22 22:41, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tetsuo, > > On Wed, 22 May 2019 21:38:45 +0900 Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> >> I want to send debug printk() patches to linux-next.git. Petr Mladek >> is suggesting me to have a git tree for debug printk() patches. >> But it seems that there is "git quiltimport" command, and I prefer >> "subversion + quilt", and I don't have trees for sending "git pull" >> requests. Therefore, just ignoring "git quiltimport" failure is fine. >> What do you think? > > Sure, we can try. I already have one quilt tree (besides Andrew's) in > linux-next, but much prefer a git tree. If you have to use a quilt > tree, I will import it into a local branch on the base you tell me to > and then fetch it every morning and reimport it if it changes. I will > then merge it like any other git branch. Let me know what you can deal > with. > What I do for making patches is: git fetch --tags git reset --hard next-$date edit files git commit -a -s git format-patch -1 git send-email --to=$recipient 0001-*.patch I'm sure I will confuse git history/repository everyday if I try to send changes using git. For my skill level, managing 0001-*.patch in a subversion repository is the simplest and safest.