From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: thread-index: AcQVpOv8zlIERBB1QoCsDcBD7fUQng== Envelope-to: paul@sumlocktest.fsnet.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:00:01 +0000 Message-ID: <041901c415a4$ebfcce50$d100000a@sbs2003.local> Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Subject: Re: 2.6.0: atyfb broken Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 From: "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" Reply-To: To: Cc: "Andrew Morton" , , "Linux Kernel list" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:45:55 +0100 Sender: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2004 15:45:55.0171 (UTC) FILETIME=[EC03D330:01C415A4] On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 10:33, James Simmons wrote: > > > Ben, if you could shoot me over a copy of the current linux-fbdev tree that > > > might help things along a bit. > > > > linux-fbdev is at bk://fbdev.bkbits.net/fbdev-2.5 > > > > Some things in there are too crappy though, like the whole gfx-client > > stuff, I suggest you don't merge as-is. I will start sending you > > patches tomorrow hopefully. > > Is the gfx-client stuff the only issue for The main one. I have some problems with the pixmap code (see my other message about this, the locking is definitely broken) and I'm not sure we want to merge the allocation changes upstream yet (well, maybe they are stable enough by now ?) Ben.