From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] y2038: Add mutex_timedlock64() support References: <20210810102344.49471-1-florian.bezdeka@siemens.com> <262f8a56-2afb-b486-dcf5-a5032e137f7d@siemens.com> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <046bb3ac-3e5c-f8b2-c1d7-5225329d3814@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:38:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <262f8a56-2afb-b486-dcf5-a5032e137f7d@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Florian Bezdeka , xenomai@xenomai.org On 10.08.21 12:33, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote: > On 10.08.21 12:23, Florian Bezdeka wrote: >> Hi! >> >> This series is based on the series posted by Song some time ago. The >> testing part has been heavily reworked. Details are mentioned in the >> description of the last patch. >> >> @Jan: Patch 1 and 2 are re-sends. They are not directly related to the >> y2038 stuff but the testsuite might fail if they are not applied. >> >> Testing was done on x86 only so far, internal CI is still running but no >> problems expected. >> >> Best regards, >> Florian >> >> Changes in v5: >> - Patch 5: Integrated fixes already made by Jan on next >> - Patch 5: Fix typo >> > > Is this series equivalent with bb64c8c66aeec3b5ead55fcfa9c79efda8064f7f > in next? Or do I have to replace next with it? Or do I only have to > replace bb64c8c66a (patch 5)? > Anyway, just pulled them all and put this as well as the mq series on top of new next. Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux