From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDDBC3F2D1 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 01:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4B42084E for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 01:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725893AbgCEBIY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 20:08:24 -0500 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.44]:43688 "EHLO out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725774AbgCEBIY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 20:08:24 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R821e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04426;MF=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=9;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Trh.EBT_1583370490; Received: from testdeMacBook-Pro.local(mailfrom:yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Trh.EBT_1583370490) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:08:21 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: fix the nonsense shares when load of cfs_rq is too, small To: Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot Cc: Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , "open list:SCHEDULER" References: <44fa1cee-08db-e4ab-e5ab-08d6fbd421d7@linux.alibaba.com> <20200303195245.GF2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <241603dd-1149-58aa-85cf-43f3da2de43f@linux.alibaba.com> <20200304095209.GK2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= Message-ID: <0489ca96-29a3-921e-ca29-00108929a041@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:08:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200304095209.GK2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/3/4 下午5:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 09:47:34AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> you will add +1 of nice prio for each device >> >> should we use instead >> # define scale_load_down(w) ((w >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT) ? (w >> >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT) : MIN_SHARES) > > That's '((w >> SHIFT) ?: MIN_SHARES)', but even that is not quite right. > > I think we want something like: > > #define scale_load_down(w) \ > ({ unsigned long ___w = (w); \ > if (___w) \ > ____w = max(MIN_SHARES, ___w >> SHIFT); \ > ___w; }) > > That is, we very much want to retain 0 I'm thinking. Should works, I'll give this one a test and send another fix :-) Regards, Michael Wang >