From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFFDC433E5 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4620120656 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732164AbgGVMzh (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:55:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37002 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726525AbgGVMzg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 08:55:36 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83E3BC0619DC; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jyEHN-0094wv-03; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:55:25 +0200 Message-ID: <04d7301d5ad7555a0377c7df530ad8522fc00f77.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread From: Johannes Berg To: Felix Fietkau , Rajkumar Manoharan , Rakesh Pillai Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:55:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1595351666-28193-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> <1595351666-28193-3-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> <13573549c277b34d4c87c471ff1a7060@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3 (3.36.3-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > I'm considering testing a different approach (with mt76 initially): > - Add a mac80211 rx function that puts processed skbs into a list > instead of handing them to the network stack directly. Would this be *after* all the mac80211 processing, i.e. in place of the rx-up-to-stack? johannes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([2a01:4f8:191:4433::2] helo=sipsolutions.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyEHd-0001Jl-8Y for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:55:43 +0000 Message-ID: <04d7301d5ad7555a0377c7df530ad8522fc00f77.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread From: Johannes Berg Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:55:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1595351666-28193-1-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> <1595351666-28193-3-git-send-email-pillair@codeaurora.org> <13573549c277b34d4c87c471ff1a7060@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Felix Fietkau , Rajkumar Manoharan , Rakesh Pillai Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, dianders@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kvalo@codeaurora.org On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > I'm considering testing a different approach (with mt76 initially): > - Add a mac80211 rx function that puts processed skbs into a list > instead of handing them to the network stack directly. Would this be *after* all the mac80211 processing, i.e. in place of the rx-up-to-stack? johannes _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k