[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] gpio: zynq: Setup bank_name to dev->name

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>]

On 23.7.2018 20:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> On 23 July 2018 at 03:08, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 20.7.2018 21:31, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> Am 12.07.2018 um 16:04 schrieb Michal Simek:
>>>> There should be proper bank name setup to distiguish between different
>>>> gpio drivers. Use dev->name for it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>   drivers/gpio/zynq_gpio.c | 2 ++
>>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/zynq_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/zynq_gpio.c
>>>> index 26f69b1a713f..f793ee5754a8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/zynq_gpio.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/zynq_gpio.c
>>>> @@ -337,6 +337,8 @@ static int zynq_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>>>       struct zynq_gpio_privdata *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>>>>       struct gpio_dev_priv *uc_priv = dev_get_uclass_priv(dev);
>>>>   +    uc_priv->bank_name = dev->name;
>>>> +
>>>>       if (priv->p_data)
>>>>           uc_priv->gpio_count = priv->p_data->ngpio;
>>>>
>>> Does this not lead to ugly names because the gpio number is append to
>>> the bank_name? Have you check the "gpio status -a" output?
>>
>> Yes I was checking it. Names are composed together but also just numbers
>> works as before.
>>
>> gpio at ff0a00000: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00001: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00002: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00003: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00004: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00005: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00006: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00007: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00008: input: 0 [ ]
>> gpio at ff0a00009: input: 0 [ ]
>>
>> If you know better way how to setup a bank name please let me know but I
>> need to distinguish ps gpio from pl one and for pl we need to know the
>> address.
>>
>>>
>>> Other drivers use the gpio-bank-name from the device tree.
>>
>> I can't see this property inside Linux kernel. If this has been reviewed
>> by dt guys please let me know.
> 
> Linux doesn't have this concept and has no command line. I am
> skeptical they would be interested in adding the property.
> 
> If we can get this in by renaming it (e.g. to u-boot,gpio-bank-name)
> then that would be OK. Otherwise I think we just have to rely on
> having our own binding file.

There is a label property which could be used instead.

Thanks,
Michal