From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] Update license information Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:45:25 +0200 Message-ID: <05ac45bf-d05c-970b-4c34-d2245a0c4cf7@redhat.com> References: <1493812229-21037-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: drjones@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com To: Thomas Huth , kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55658 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751264AbdECMpe (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2017 08:45:34 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A513C76FA for ; Wed, 3 May 2017 12:45:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1493812229-21037-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/05/2017 13:50, Thomas Huth wrote: > The COPYRIGHT file claims that the kvm-unit-tests is licensed > under the LGPL. But effectively, the license for the whole > package should be GPL nowadays instead, since some GPL code > crept in over the years. So let's update the COPYRIGHT text > accordingly and add some more license information to the files > that are still missing an explicit license statement. > > Thomas Huth (3): > Add LGPL information to some ARM and PPC specific library files > COPYRIGHT: Make it clear that kvm-unit-tests is GPL2 nowadays > Add a copyright/license header for the ARM spinlock test > > COPYRIGHT | 10 ++++++++-- > arm/spinlock-test.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > lib/arm/spinlock.c | 6 ++++++ > lib/powerpc/processor.c | 3 +++ > lib/ppc64/spinlock.c | 7 +++++++ > 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. Paolo