On 03/16/2017 09:50 AM, Vinzenz 'evilissimo' Feenstra wrote: > From: Vinzenz Feenstra > > Add a new 'guest-get-osinfo' command for reporting basic information of > the guest operating system (hereafter just 'OS'). This information > includes the type of the OS, the version, and the architecture. > Additionally reported would be a name, distribution type and kernel > version where applicable. > > Here an example for a Fedora 25 VM: > > $ virsh -c qemu:////system qemu-agent-command F25 \ > '{ "execute": "guest-get-osinfo" }' > {"return":{"arch":"x86_64","codename":"Server Edition","version":"25", > "kernel":"4.8.6-300.fc25.x86_64","type":"linux","distribution":"Fedora"}} > > And an example for a Windows 2012 R2 VM: > > $ virsh -c qemu:////system qemu-agent-command Win2k12R2 \ > '{ "execute": "guest-get-osinfo" }' > {"return":{"arch":"x86_64","codename":"Win 2012 R2", > "version":"6.3","kernel":"","type":"windows","distribution":""}} > > Signed-off-by: Vinzenz Feenstra > --- Let's make sure we get the interface right, before I even bother looking at the code. > +++ b/qga/qapi-schema.json > @@ -1042,3 +1042,43 @@ > 'data': { 'path': 'str', '*arg': ['str'], '*env': ['str'], > '*input-data': 'str', '*capture-output': 'bool' }, > 'returns': 'GuestExec' } > + > +## > +# @GuestOSType: > +# > +# @linux: Indicator for linux distributions > +# @windows: Indicator for windows versions > +# @other: Indicator for any other operating system that is not yet > +# explicitly supported > +# > +# Since: 2.10 > +## > +{ 'enum': 'GuestOSType', 'data': ['linux', 'windows', 'other'] } > + > +## > +# @GuestOSInfo: > +# > +# @version: OS version, e.g. 25 for FC25 etc. > +# @distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS... > +# @codename: Code name of the OS. e.g. Ubuntu has Xenial Xerus etc. > +# @arch: Architecture of the OS e.g. x86, x86_64, ppc64, aarch64... > +# @type: Specifies the type of the OS. > +# @kernel: Linux kernel version (Might be used by other OS types too). > +# May be empty. Why would it be empty, instead of just omitted? > +# Since: 2.10 > +## > +{ 'struct': 'GuestOSInfo', > + 'data': { '*version': 'str', '*distribution': 'str', '*codename': 'str', > + '*arch': 'str', 'type': 'GuestOSType', '*kernel': 'str'} } So everything except 'type' is optional? Is there anything a client can actually rely on being always present? uname() is probably the lowest-common-denominator interface for describing a system (in that it is implemented on more OSs than anything else, and Windows information can be mapped to uname concepts). Let's compare: POSIX says: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_utsname.h.html#tag_13_70 The header shall define the structure utsname which shall include at least the following members: char sysname[] Name of this implementation of the operating system. char nodename[] Name of this node within the communications network to which this node is attached, if any. char release[] Current release level of this implementation. char version[] Current version level of this release. char machine[] Name of the hardware type on which the system is running. So you both have version; your 'arch' maps somewhat to machine, your 'type' maps somewhat to sysname, your 'kernel' probably matches release, and then you are adding 'distribution' and 'codename' which don't appear in uname output. Is it worth naming your members after the uname() names, for less confusion? > + > +## > +# @guest-get-osinfo: > +# > +# Retrieve guest operating system information > +# > +# Returns: operating system information on success > +# > +# Since 2.10 > +## > +{ 'command': 'guest-get-osinfo', > + 'returns': 'GuestOSInfo' } > -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org