From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954C4C07E9C for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 621E7616EB for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 17:49:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 621E7616EB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Y96-0003dq-Hz for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:49:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Xdl-0007yP-Cg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:16:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:38292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Xdj-0002yK-F6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:16:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625764602; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LZ+JBhU1tJIeMTIQ3Y72tUVIjZH55sxLnFovFGvWJV8=; b=SfmEYupRluqbnJe9KjdTeUt/flrqKUmPtrWseVHN9yuGROKy99fKEowEqqzch5uB/B2wPF /k8LAJWyUfbbutNSYqygSwg+5JZiJR9ZBrKQ5Nvus8V/cGkw5XMEEMJXdjxBT3zAL+n/B9 jSYYG+1tKSDDcGLYBDaTMvVkLGhyFlU= Received: from mail-pj1-f72.google.com (mail-pj1-f72.google.com [209.85.216.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-177-iI0DqYRYMcGxfhj98ugeeA-1; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 13:16:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: iI0DqYRYMcGxfhj98ugeeA-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f72.google.com with SMTP id k92-20020a17090a14e5b02901731af08bd7so4222036pja.2 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LZ+JBhU1tJIeMTIQ3Y72tUVIjZH55sxLnFovFGvWJV8=; b=BdHgcLmA+euuVvRDWeU/Yn9n7ezswuo+TLkUd2xWDPwZiAc+lLP6wzpmfWzRu77fyZ E9PGUVoYmQt5nqhOzHvUIYkj/MNzkHZbxRBxNvI0MJczKCXwS5RtFX8rLBbKB8T0U86p zjm09X7A5UCP06HCfJXyRGXJWz/9wwsPLPrOfuBhVVpsizQ8LKqdskzpKZEvUSa3IvHN 6fako3f6AAjJibvRL+w9Y7a2eUI7A7UQfxT+ZJmXDxYiV6IQjQ4AcjZ9N82AkKRexpsZ pArAzBqDQ7f0+Vqxqbww0hpT6YdgFZQHqW2kZS1LISuKVmOL85axABQLhfR6b1O1n9wq TH2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LHRUYQF/vd048O3wAv0x8kpfdZ+nK8dIP290iVx/zZmRThvhl OjCt/6xarQlPtJ7TR3ISG2a4SvljgpfPApZxPx8C8BQuDPZQXY6VK5D0LYIarUCe8e6YoLo1jaf Bzirzk271MuayzBg= X-Received: by 2002:a63:eb04:: with SMTP id t4mr33747768pgh.84.1625764600300; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 10:16:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcRGigFrTMUDAuQ6C2qoEmC/pEkuZpzug+3ZKO6xTT4OoEQC2tfrCrkvsx1FSX1xeQSY5icA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:eb04:: with SMTP id t4mr33747741pgh.84.1625764600084; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 10:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.183] (c-76-27-223-100.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [76.27.223.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm3195455pfd.91.2021.07.08.10.16.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 10:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/sev: Measured Linux SEV guest with kernel/initrd/cmdline To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Paolo Bonzini References: <20210624102040.2015280-1-dovmurik@linux.ibm.com> <2dc6c60e-48f8-7c6f-6131-0bc1020e106f@redhat.com> From: Connor Kuehl Message-ID: <05d0ae90-a45f-157b-d37c-942bc0442449@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 10:16:37 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ckuehl@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=ckuehl@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.45, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tom Lendacky , Ashish Kalra , Brijesh Singh , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , James Bottomley , Richard Henderson , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Dov Murik , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Jim Cadden , Laszlo Ersek Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 7/8/21 10:03 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 7/8/21 6:41 PM, Connor Kuehl wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> Please consider this series[1] for inclusion into your next pull request. >> >> Just a note that this series has a companion series that is getting >> upstreamed into OVMF[2] > > Shouldn't we get the OVMF part merged first? The approach taken in the OVMF series doesn't seem very controversial, so I don't anticipate any breaking changes with the current state of those patches as far as QEMU is concerned. However, I'm fine with erring on the side of caution. Connor