From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Cutler Subject: Re: Jewel regression (not released, but still serious) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:08:34 +0200 Message-ID: <06474a19-6a20-fff5-a6b4-99e8165f61d4@suse.cz> References: <012d38c3-3347-e62e-3fcd-83be48bfe842@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42588 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752910AbdDRWIh (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:08:37 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A604BABCF for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <012d38c3-3347-e62e-3fcd-83be48bfe842@suse.cz> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Examining the test yaml again, it seems strange that a test called "upgrade:hammer-x/f-h-x-offline" should install firefly and then upgrade directly to "x" (jewel in this case). . . Opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19687 and proposed fix at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/14626 - reviews welcome. On 04/18/2017 11:03 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote: > Somehow, something got merged to jewel recently that caused a regression > which showed up in 10.2.8 integration testing. Bisect is ongoing at > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19538#note-30 > > NOTE: no released versions are affected - not even v10.2.7. > > Please refrain from merging anything to jewel until the issue is resolved.