From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>,
Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dianders@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:57:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06a4f84b-a0d4-3f90-40bb-f02f365460ec@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f2726ff-8ba9-5278-0ec6-b80be475ea98@nbd.name>
On 7/22/20 6:00 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2020-07-22 14:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>>> I'm considering testing a different approach (with mt76 initially):
>>> - Add a mac80211 rx function that puts processed skbs into a list
>>> instead of handing them to the network stack directly.
>>
>> Would this be *after* all the mac80211 processing, i.e. in place of the
>> rx-up-to-stack?
> Yes, it would run all the rx handlers normally and then put the
> resulting skbs into a list instead of calling netif_receive_skb or
> napi_gro_frags.
Whatever came of this? I realized I'm running Felix's patch since his mt76
driver needs it. Any chance it will go upstream?
Thanks,
Ben
>
> - Felix
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@codeaurora.org>,
Rakesh Pillai <pillair@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dianders@chromium.org, evgreen@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:57:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06a4f84b-a0d4-3f90-40bb-f02f365460ec@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f2726ff-8ba9-5278-0ec6-b80be475ea98@nbd.name>
On 7/22/20 6:00 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2020-07-22 14:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 14:27 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>
>>> I'm considering testing a different approach (with mt76 initially):
>>> - Add a mac80211 rx function that puts processed skbs into a list
>>> instead of handing them to the network stack directly.
>>
>> Would this be *after* all the mac80211 processing, i.e. in place of the
>> rx-up-to-stack?
> Yes, it would run all the rx handlers normally and then put the
> resulting skbs into a list instead of calling netif_receive_skb or
> napi_gro_frags.
Whatever came of this? I realized I'm running Felix's patch since his mt76
driver needs it. Any chance it will go upstream?
Thanks,
Ben
>
> - Felix
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 17:14 [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets " Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 1/7] mac80211: Add check for napi handle before WARN_ON Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-22 12:56 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-22 12:56 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-23 18:26 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 18:26 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-23 20:06 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-24 6:21 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 6:21 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-26 16:19 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-26 16:19 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-30 12:40 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-30 12:40 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 21:53 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2020-07-21 21:53 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2020-07-22 12:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-22 12:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-22 12:55 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-22 12:55 ` Johannes Berg
2020-07-22 13:00 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-22 13:00 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-23 6:09 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2020-07-23 6:09 ` Rajkumar Manoharan
2021-03-22 23:57 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2021-03-22 23:57 ` Ben Greear
2021-03-23 1:20 ` Brian Norris
2021-03-23 1:20 ` Brian Norris
2021-03-23 3:01 ` Ben Greear
2021-03-23 3:01 ` Ben Greear
2021-03-23 7:45 ` Felix Fietkau
2021-03-23 7:45 ` Felix Fietkau
2021-03-25 9:45 ` Rakesh Pillai
2021-03-25 9:45 ` Rakesh Pillai
2021-03-25 10:33 ` Felix Fietkau
2021-03-25 10:33 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-23 18:25 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 18:25 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 23:11 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-24 23:11 ` Jacob Keller
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 3/7] ath10k: Add module param to enable rx thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 4/7] ath10k: Do not exhaust budget on process tx completion Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 5/7] ath10k: Handle the rx packet processing in thread Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 6/7] ath10k: Add deliver to stack from thread context Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` [RFC 7/7] ath10k: Handle rx thread suspend and resume Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:14 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 23:06 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-23 23:06 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-24 6:19 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 6:19 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-21 17:25 ` [RFC 0/7] Add support to process rx packets in thread Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 17:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 18:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-21 18:05 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-23 18:21 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 18:21 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-23 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-23 19:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-24 6:20 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 6:20 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-24 22:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-24 22:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-07-22 9:12 ` David Laight
2020-07-22 9:12 ` David Laight
2020-07-25 8:16 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 10:38 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 10:38 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 12:25 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 14:08 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 14:08 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 14:57 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 15:41 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-25 15:41 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2020-07-26 11:16 ` David Laight
2020-07-26 11:16 ` David Laight
2020-07-28 16:59 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-28 16:59 ` Rakesh Pillai
2020-07-29 1:34 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-25 17:57 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-25 17:57 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-26 1:22 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-26 8:10 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-26 8:10 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-26 8:32 ` Hillf Danton
2020-07-26 8:59 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-26 8:59 ` Felix Fietkau
2020-07-22 16:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-22 16:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06a4f84b-a0d4-3f90-40bb-f02f365460ec@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pillair@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rmanohar@codeaurora.org \
--subject='Re: [RFC 2/7] ath10k: Add support to process rx packet in thread' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.